Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42472817›Full record

ReviewAnnals of general psychiatry2026

Efficacy of curcumin in depression: A grade-assessed systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Vali Musazadeh, Amir Hossein Faghfouri, Maryam Falahatzadeh, Mahsa Mahmoudinezhad, Mohammad Alizadeh, Farzad Shidfar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of general psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Vali MusazadehStudent Research Committee, School of Public Health, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Amir Hossein FaghfouriMaternal and Childhood Obesity Research Center, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran.
Maryam FalahatzadehDepartment of Pharmacy, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Mahsa MahmoudinezhadStudent Research Committee, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran.
Mohammad AlizadehFood and Beverages Safety Research Center, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran. Alizade85@yahoo.com.
Farzad ShidfarDepartment of Nutrition, School of Public Health, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. shidfar.f@iums.ac.ir.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundsCurcumin is a natural polyphenolic compound that is believed to have the potential to treat various ailments, including depressive mood. However, studies on the anti-depressive properties of curcumin have yielded conflicting results. This meta-analysis seeks to assess the clinical benefits of curcumin for patients with depression or depressive symptoms.

methodsWe systematically reviewed Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase, inception February 15, 2025, to identify studies evaluating the impact of curcumin supplementation on depression in adults. The overall effects calculated using random effects model.

resultsNineteen RCTs were included in meta-analysis. A pooled analysis of eight studies showed a significant effect for curcumin supplementation in term of improving depression (SMD: -0.76; 95% CI: -1.22, -0.30, p = 0.001; I

conclusionsThis meta-analysis suggests that curcumin supplementation may improve depression and depressive symptoms significantly; however, due to sensitivity analysis the observed effect was fragile. Therefore, these findings should be interpreted with caution, and further high-quality trials are needed to determine its potential clinical efficacy.

Indexed as

CurcuminDepressionMeta-analysisSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID42472817
PMCPMC13670733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.