ArticleBMC women's health2026
Predicting women's intention to use contraceptives in East Africa: a machine learning analysis of predictors.
Article in BMC women's health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionIntention to use contraceptives reflects an individual's or couple's plan to adopt contraceptive methods, supporting women's reproductive autonomy. It is associated with reduced unintended pregnancies, unsafe abortions, and high fertility rates, thereby improving maternal and infant health outcomes. Machine learning approaches can strengthen prediction accuracy and support evidence-based reproductive health planning. This study aimed to predict women's intention to use contraceptives in East Africa using machine-learning methods.
methodsWe analyzed Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) data from 11 East African countries (2015-2024) in a community-based cross-sectional design. Country-specific sampling weights, stratification, and clustering were applied to account for the complex survey design. Missing data were imputed using the KNNImputer, and predictors were harmonized across surveys. Data preprocessing included cleaning, transformation, integration, and one-hot encoding, with an 80/20 train-test split. Seven machine learning algorithms were evaluated: adaptive boosting, CatBoost, random forest, light gradient boosting, extreme gradient boosting, logistic regression, and decision tree. Hyperparameters for CatBoost were tuned using Bayesian optimization under stratified 10-fold cross-validation. Model transportability was assessed using leave-one-country-out cross-validation.
resultsAmong 123,290 reproductive-age women in East Africa, 51.23% reported intention to use contraceptives. Boosted tree algorithms performed best, particularly CatBoost achieving the highest discrimination with an AUC of 80.09% and an accuracy of 73.48%. Leave-one-country-out cross-validation confirmed moderate transportability with an AUC 74%, while calibration analysis showed reliable probability estimates (Brier score 0.179). SHAP feature importance identified employment, education, age, hearing about family planning, pregnancy, breastfeeding, barriers to healthcare access, and fertility preference as the most influential predictors of contraceptive intention.
conclusionThis study provides a transparent, reproducible framework for pooled DHS prediction modeling, offering actionable insights for policymakers and health planners while serving as a methodological foundation for future applied work.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.