ArticleBMC oral health2026
Exploring the use of large language models for self-learning in preventive dentistry and their associations with academic performance: a cross-sectional pilot study among dental students.
Article in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLarge language models (LLMs) are being gradually integrated into dental education, but more attention was paid in perspective of educators rather than students. Evidence regarding how students employ them for self-learning in Preventive Dentistry, and whether specific usage patterns are related to academic performance, remains scarce. This study examined dental students' self-perceived LLM knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors; evaluated perceived usefulness across Preventive Dentistry modules; and explored associations between LLM usage (frequency, type, motivation) and academic performance.
methodsThis cross-sectional pilot study recruited all third-year dental undergraduates enrolled in a Preventive Dentistry course at a university in eastern China. A total of 117 students provided valid responses and completed final examination. Academic performance was assessed using final examination scores as a continuous outcome variable. Linear regression analysis was performed to examine associations between LLM usage and examination scores. The data were analyzed using SPSS 22.0, and the level of significance was set at 0.05.
resultsLLM use was reported by all participants, with eighty-four students (71.8%) considering themselves as proficient users. For self-learning in Preventive Dentistry, 49.6% of participants reported using LLMs one to three times per month and DeepSeek (99.1%) was most popular. Students perceived LLMs as more helpful for theoretical learning than for practical skill acquisition (p < 0.001). The most frequently reported motivation for LLM use was to broaden knowledge and facilitate comprehension (76.1%), compared with other motivations. Importantly, the linear regression model (adjusted R
conclusionsIn this pilot sample, LLMs were widely reported to be used and were perceived by these students as more helpful for learning theoretical rather than for practical knowledge during self-learning in Preventive Dentistry. Using LLMs to broaden knowledge and facilitate comprehension was the most frequently reported motivation and showed a modest positive association with academic performance, although causality cannot be inferred due to the cross-sectional design. These findings provide preliminary insights into students' use of LLMs and may help inform future research on their role in dental education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.