Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42472794›Full record

Trial reportBMC musculoskeletal disorders2026

A randomized controlled trial of brachial plexus block manipulation versus steroid injection in conscious patients for moderate to severe shoulder stiffness.

Zheng Yan, Yinzhe Cui, Kairui Zhang, Jia Ma, Zhefeng Jin, Jiangtao Si, Zhijun Zhang, Jiawen Zhan, Xu Wei, Jie Yu and 2 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialEquivalence TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Zheng Yan *Wangjing Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, No.6 Wangjing Zhonghuan South Rd, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China.
Yinzhe Cui *Wangjing Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, No.6 Wangjing Zhonghuan South Rd, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China.
Kairui Zhang *Wangjing Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, No.6 Wangjing Zhonghuan South Rd, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China.
Jia MaWangjing Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, No.6 Wangjing Zhonghuan South Rd, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China. f3c_ma@163.com.
Zhefeng JinWangjing Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, No.6 Wangjing Zhonghuan South Rd, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China.
Jiangtao SiWangjing Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, No.6 Wangjing Zhonghuan South Rd, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China.
Zhijun ZhangWangjing Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, No.6 Wangjing Zhonghuan South Rd, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China.
Jiawen ZhanWangjing Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, No.6 Wangjing Zhonghuan South Rd, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China.
Xu WeiWangjing Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, No.6 Wangjing Zhonghuan South Rd, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China.
Jie YuWangjing Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, No.6 Wangjing Zhonghuan South Rd, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China.
Yongli DongWangjing Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, No.6 Wangjing Zhonghuan South Rd, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China.
Liguo ZhuWangjing Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, No.6 Wangjing Zhonghuan South Rd, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China.

Funding

The major research project of the Science and Technology Innovation Project of the Chinese Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine CI2021A02016the major research project of the Scientific and Technological Innovation Project of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences CI2026A02006The National Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine Clinical Collaboration Program of Chinese and Western Medicine for Critical and Difficult Diseases ZDYN-2024-A-043The Special Project for Clinical Evidence-based Research of Traditional Chinese Medicine in the Construction Project of High-level Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospitals of Wangjing Hospital of Chinese Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences WJYY-XZKT-2023-12
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntra-articular corticosteroid injection in combination with rehabilitation is a prevalent treatment modality for moderate-to-severe shoulder stiffness. However, this approach frequently results in delayed and incomplete recovery. Conversely, arthroscopic capsular release is associated with inherent surgical risks. Manipulation under anaesthesia (MUA) presents a minimally invasive alternative; however, concerns regarding intravenous anaesthesia and iatrogenic rotator cuff injury have served to limit its adoption. This randomised controlled trial aimed to evaluate the hypothesis that an Enhanced Recovery After Manipulation (ERAM) protocol incorporating an ultrasound-guided superior trunk brachial plexus block, manipulation under anaesthesia (MUA), an intra-articular corticosteroid injection and standardized rehabilitation is more effective than a corticosteroid injection and standardized rehabilitation.

methodsIn this prospective, single-center, parallel-group superiority trial, 112 patients with moderate-to-severe shoulder stiffness were randomized 1:1 to the ERAM protocol (n = 56) or intra-articular compound betamethasone injection plus standardized rehabilitation (n = 56). The primary outcome was the Constant-Murley shoulder function score. Secondary outcomes included visual analog scale (VAS) pain, passive range of motion (ROM) scores (forward flexion, abduction, external rotation, and internal rotation), and Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C), assessed at baseline, 1 week, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 6 months. Safety was evaluated with ultrasound and MRI at 8 weeks using the Snyder classification. Between-group comparisons used independent t-tests or Wilcoxon rank-sum tests; within-group changes were analyzed by repeated-measures ANOVA with Bonferroni correction.

resultsIn total, 106 patients (53 per group) completed the 6-month follow-up (5.4% attrition). Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. The ERAM group demonstrated significantly superior Constant-Murley scores, VAS pain scores, passive range of motion (composite score, forward flexion, abduction, external rotation, and internal rotation), and PGI-C ratings compared with the control group at every post-treatment time point (all P < 0.05; exact p-values reported in Table 2). Shoulder function in the ERAM group at 1 week was comparable to that of the control group at 6 months, with the greatest ROM gains occurring in forward flexion and abduction and no evidence of recurrent capsular contracture throughout follow-up. No severe adverse events occurred. One ERAM-group patient developed transient deltoid weakness attributed to perineural adhesions involving the axillary nerve, which resolved spontaneously within one day. Ultrasound and MRI at 8 weeks confirmed intact rotator cuff structures with unchanged Snyder grades in all patients.

conclusionFor patients with moderate-to-severe shoulder stiffness, including frozen shoulder with or without partial-thickness rotator cuff tears (Snyder grades 1-2), the ERAM protocol substantially shortens the clinical course and achieves accelerated, durable functional recovery compared with corticosteroid injection and standardized rehabilitation. The protocol is compatible with an ambulatory care model and demonstrates a favorable safety profile.

trial registrationThis trial was registered at the ( https://www.chictr.org.cn/ ), (ChiCTR2400083123) on 16/4/2024.

Indexed as

BetamethasoneBrachial Plexus BlockMusculoskeletal ManipulationsShoulder JointAdultFemaleHumansInjections, Intra-ArticularMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementProspective StudiesRange of Motion, ArticularRecovery of FunctionSeverity of Illness IndexTreatment OutcomeBetamethasoneBrachial plexus blockManipulation under anaesthesiaPartial-thickness rotator cuff tearShoulder stiffness

Identifiers

PMID42472794
PMCPMC13425935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.