Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42472791›Full record

Trial reportBMC oral health2026

Effectiveness of S-PRG-based varnish and bioactive glass-based air polishing in the management of dentin hypersensitivity and their effects on tooth color: a 12-month randomized clinical trial.

Omnia M Sami, Dina Kamal, Essam A Naguib, Asmaa Aly Mohamed Yassen

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05981625 (Desensitizing Effect and Tooth Color Change After Using Giomer-based Varnish Versus Bioactive Glass Air Polishing in Treating Cervical Hypersensitive Lesions), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05981625 nacompletednot on this map

Desensitizing Effect and Tooth Color Change After Using Giomer-based Varnish Versus Bioactive Glass Air Polishing in Treating Cervical Hypersensitive Lesions

TypeinterventionalSponsorCairo UniversityRan2024 to 2026Enrolled30ConditionsDentin Hypersensitivity, Non-carious Cervical Lesions, Bioactive Glass Air Polishing, S-PRGArmsGiomer varnish containing surface pre-reacted glass fillers
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Omnia M SamiDepartment of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Dina KamalDepartment of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Essam A NaguibDepartment of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Asmaa Aly Mohamed YassenDepartment of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt. asmaa.yassen@dentistry.cu.edu.eg.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate and compare the 12-month clinical effectiveness of a surface pre-reacted glass-ionomer (S-PRG)-based resin varnish and a bioactive glass-based air-polishing system in the management of dentin hypersensitivity and their effects on tooth color.

methodsThis randomized clinical trial included 34 participants diagnosed with dentin hypersensitivity. Participants were randomly allocated (1:1) to receive either an S-PRG-based varnish or a bioactive glass-based air-polishing treatment. The primary outcome was pain intensity measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), while the secondary outcome was tooth color change. Pain intensity was assessed in response to tactile, evaporative, and thermal stimuli using a 0-10 VAS. Tooth color change was evaluated using modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria. Assessments were performed at baseline, immediately post-treatment, and after 1, 6, and 12 months. Parametric VAS data were analyzed using independent t-tests for intergroup comparisons and repeated-measures ANOVA for intragroup comparisons. Categorical data were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test for intergroup comparisons and the Friedman test for intragroup comparisons. Statistical significance was set at P ≤ 0.05.

resultsThe S-PRG-based resin varnish group demonstrated significantly lower VAS scores than the bioactive glass-based air-polishing system group immediately after treatment and throughout follow-up (P < 0.05). At 12 months, the bioactive glass-based air-polishing system group showed a significant relapse in pain scores, whereas the S-PRG-based resin varnish group maintained sustained pain reduction across all stimuli (P < 0.001). Immediately after treatment, the S-PRG-based resin varnish group exhibited temporary tooth color change, while no immediate color alteration was observed in the bioactive glass-based air polishing group. No significant differences in tooth color were seen between groups at 1, 6, or 12 months.

conclusionsS-PRG-based resin varnish demonstrated greater sustained reduction in dentin hypersensitivity over the 12-month follow-up period compared with the bioactive glass-based air-polishing system and may represent a promising option for moderate-term symptom control.

trial registrationhttps://clinicaltrials.gov/ , NCT05981625, Registered 31 July 2023.

Indexed as

Acrylic ResinsDental PolishingDentin Desensitizing AgentsDentin SensitivitySilicon DioxideAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementTreatment OutcomeAcrylic ResinsDentin Desensitizing Agentsglass ionomerSilicon DioxideBioactive materialsDentin hypersensitivityDentin tubule occlusionRandomized clinical trialVisual Analog Scale

Identifiers

PMID42472791
PMCPMC13397739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.