SynthesisBMC pregnancy and childbirth2026
Scorpion envenomation in pregnancy: clinical symptoms, maternal and fetal outcomes and management strategies.
Synthesis in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundScorpion stings pose a significant public health threat, particularly in developing regions, leading to considerable morbidity and mortality. This systematic review assesses the clinical manifestations, maternal and fetal outcomes, and evaluates the treatment approaches in pregnant women affected by scorpion stings.
methodsA systematic search was conducted in multiple databases (Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, SID, and Magiran) from inception to October 26, 2024. Case reports, case series, and observational studies with accessible full texts were included based on predefined eligibility criteria. Data extraction included study characteristics, maternal and gestational age, scorpion species, symptoms, and pregnancy outcomes. The methodological quality of included studies was assessed independently by two reviewers using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Checklist for Case Reports and NIH (National Institutes of Health) Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies. Disagreements were resolved by consensus or consultation with a third reviewer.
resultsA total of 14 studies were included in the review, comprising case reports and case series from various countries. The average maternal age was 27.14 years, and gestational age averaged 23.94 weeks. Common symptoms reported included localized pain (71.4%), nausea (14.3%), vomiting (14.3%), fever (14.3%), and abnormal vital signs (7.1%) in severe cases. The majority of studies (78.6%) indicated low symptom severity. Maternal and fetal outcomes were generally favorable, although severe outcomes, such as maternal death and intrauterine fetal death, were reported in a few cases. Antivenom was administered in only four cases (28.6%) indicating a potential gap in its use.
conclusionsScorpion envenomation during pregnancy typically presents with localized pain, while severe systemic symptoms are less common. Although most maternal and fetal outcomes are favorable, serious complications such as maternal or intrauterine fetal death can occur. These findings suggest that antivenom may be underutilized in pregnant women. Therefore, we recommend: (1) increased vigilance for severe symptoms, especially abnormal vital signs; (2) timely antivenom administration in moderate-to-severe cases; and (3) standardized reporting of pregnancy-specific outcomes. Large prospective studies are urgently needed to establish evidence-based management guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.