ReviewEmergency radiology2026
Imaging suspected posterior circulation stroke in the emergency department: a practical modality-based review.
Review in Emergency radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Posterior circulation stroke (PCS) accounts for 20-25% of ischemic strokes and is disproportionately missed at first presentation. This review summarizes brain parenchymal and neurovascular imaging modalities for the evaluation of suspected PCS in the emergency department (ED). We conducted a structured narrative review of established and emerging modalities, describing each modality's technical principles, clinical roles, performance estimates, evidence base, limitations, and real-world application. Searches emphasized ED populations and posterior fossa infarction; society guidelines and meta-analyses were prioritized. Non-contrast CT is insensitive for acute PCS (reported 16-44%) but remains essential for excluding hemorrhage. CT angiography is roughly 80% sensitive for vertebrobasilar occlusion in selected cohorts and ~ 44% sensitive for PCS overall. CT perfusion adds incremental sensitivity (around 70-75%). MRI with diffusion-weighted imaging is ~ 80% sensitive in pooled estimates; high-resolution DWI may approach 90-95% in single-center series. Emerging modalities - dual-energy CT (41-88% sensitive), portable low-field MRI (estimated 69% sensitive), and accelerated or abbreviated MRI (likely 80-95% sensitive) - are at varying stages of adoption. Performance metrics of emerging modalities derive from small, single-center cohorts with probable spectrum bias. Evaluation of the brain parenchyma and vasculature represent distinct clinical questions, for which dedicated imaging may be required. Accurate diagnosis of PCS requires careful selection and, often, a combination of imaging modalities tailored to the clinical question and local resources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42472769What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.