Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42472759›Full record

SynthesisLangenbeck's archives of surgery2026

Spinal anesthesia in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: analgesia and recovery outcomes - a cohort study and systematic review of randomized controlled studies.

Eleonora Bianchi, Anne Seidl, Elena Krombholz, Michael C Frey, Isabelle Obrecht, Simone Hasler-Gehrer, Andreas Keerl, Andrea R Kopp Lugli, Andrea Wirsching, Antonio Nocito

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Eleonora BianchiDepartment of General-, Visceral- and Vascular Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Baden, Im Ergel 1, Baden, CH-5404, Switzerland.
Anne SeidlDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Cantonal Hospital Baden, Baden, Switzerland.
Elena KrombholzDepartment of General-, Visceral- and Vascular Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Baden, Im Ergel 1, Baden, CH-5404, Switzerland.
Michael C FreyDepartment of General-, Visceral- and Vascular Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Baden, Im Ergel 1, Baden, CH-5404, Switzerland.
Isabelle ObrechtDepartment of General-, Visceral- and Vascular Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Baden, Im Ergel 1, Baden, CH-5404, Switzerland.
Simone Hasler-GehrerDepartment of General-, Visceral- and Vascular Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Baden, Im Ergel 1, Baden, CH-5404, Switzerland.
Andreas KeerlDepartment of General-, Visceral- and Vascular Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Baden, Im Ergel 1, Baden, CH-5404, Switzerland.
Andrea R Kopp LugliDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Cantonal Hospital Baden, Baden, Switzerland.
Andrea WirschingDepartment of General-, Visceral- and Vascular Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Baden, Im Ergel 1, Baden, CH-5404, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5175-2814
Antonio NocitoDepartment of General-, Visceral- and Vascular Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Baden, Im Ergel 1, Baden, CH-5404, Switzerland. antonio.nocito@ksb.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6062-2077

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSpinal anesthesia has been increasingly discussed as an adjunct to general anesthesia in laparoscopic colorectal surgery due to its potential to enhance early analgesia and reduce opioid exposure. Whether these benefits translate into improved postoperative bowel recovery remains unclear, and existing evidence is limited by heterogeneous study designs and small sample sizes. This study combines prospective cohort data with a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to evaluate the effects of spinal anesthesia on pain, opioid use, and bowel function.

methodsAll consecutive patients undergoing elective laparoscopic colorectal resection without ostomy formation between October 2021 and December 2024 were included in a prospective cohort and offered spinal anesthesia. Outcomes were compared between patients receiving spinal anesthesia and controls managed with general anesthesia alone. Primary endpoints were postoperative bowel recovery (time to flatus, stool, full oral diet) and prolonged postoperative ileus. Secondary endpoints included pain scores, opioid consumption, length of stay and postoperative complications. META-ANALYSIS: A systematic search of Medline (Ovid), EMBASE, CINAHL, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science and Scopus from inception to October 2023 identified randomized controlled trials comparing colorectal surgery with and without single-shot spinal anesthesia. Outcomes of interest included time to oral diet, flatus and stool, pain scores at 24 h, opioid use within 24 h and length of hospital stay. Meta-analyses were performed using random-effects models.

resultsA total of 242 patients were included in the cohort (153 with spinal anesthesia, 89 controls). Spinal anesthesia resulted in markedly reduced early opioid use and lower pain scores within the first 12 h postoperatively (e.g., NRS 0-3 h: 0 vs. 4, p < 0.001). However, time to flatus, stool and full oral diet were comparable between groups, and the incidence of prolonged postoperative ileus remained low and similar (5% vs. 6%). Major postoperative complications were the only independent predictor of prolonged ileus in multivariate analysis (OR 8.55, p = 0.001). The meta-analysis included five randomized trials comprising 338 patients. Spinal anesthesia was consistently associated with reduced pain at 24 h (SMD: -0.749, 95% CI -1.219 to -0.279, p-value: 0.002) and lower opioid requirements within 24 h (SMD: -1.994, 95% CI -2.315 to -1.673, p-value < 0.001); respectively but showed no significant effect on postoperative bowel recovery or length of stay.

conclusionsAcross both prospective cohort data and randomized evidence, spinal anesthesia offers clear early analgesic benefits and reduces postoperative opioid use in laparoscopic colorectal surgery, but does not improve bowel recovery or reduce prolonged postoperative ileus. Prolonged ileus is driven mainly by major postoperative complications rather than analgesic modality. Spinal anesthesia should therefore be viewed as a safe and effective analgesic adjunct rather than a means to influence gastrointestinal recovery.

Indexed as

Anesthesia, SpinalLaparoscopyPostoperative PainAnalgesics, OpioidCohort StudiesColorectal Surgical ProceduresFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRecovery of FunctionAnalgesics, OpioidColorectal surgeryOpioidPostoperativ bowl recoveryPostoperativ ileusSpinal anesthesia

Identifiers

PMID42472759
PMCPMC13661704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.