ArticleHospital pediatrics2026
Blood Culture Practices in Pediatric Intensive Care Units to Inform a Diagnostic Stewardship Intervention.
Article in Hospital pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBlood culture practice patterns, including blood culture indications and thresholds to culture based on patient-level factors, vary among pediatric intensive care units (PICUs) and pediatricians, and over-testing can be common.
methodsNine PICUs across the United States performed audits of randomly selected blood cultures in PICU patients across 4 seasons in a 12-month period. Cultures were audited for indication and associated clinical and patient-level factors. Sites applied their institutional guidelines to define fever and immunocompromised states. Data were analyzed to determine if certain culture indications were associated with sites' baseline blood culture rates.
resultsIn total, 1068 cultures were audited with a 6% positivity rate. New symptoms (such as fever, hypothermia, or concern for sepsis) accounted for most cultures obtained (71%), with concern for sepsis documented in about 38% of culture episodes. More than half of cultures were obtained despite a documented alternative source of symptoms. The practice of collecting asymptomatic or surveillance cultures was highly variable across sites, with 3 sites accounting for 84% of all asymptomatic cultures.
conclusionsA large proportion of blood cultures in PICU patients were drawn for new symptoms, though often without a clear concern for sepsis and when an alternative source of symptoms was suspected or documented. Practices were variable regarding surveillance cultures. Work to develop and optimize thresholds and standard practices for sending cultures is critical to inform ongoing diagnostic stewardship efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.