ReviewAge and ageing2026
Multidisciplinary recommendations for palliative and supportive care in Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease and related disorders.
Review in Age and ageing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
35 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prion diseases, of which Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease is the most common, are fatal neurodegenerative disorders and are often rapidly progressive. They are associated with a significant palliative care burden for patients and families, ranging from prognostic uncertainty to complex symptom management to caregiver distress. Healthcare professionals face unique pressures when caring for these patients, which can include a lack of familiarity with this rare diagnosis and rapidly evolving symptom needs due to accelerated clinical deterioration. We convened a multidisciplinary panel of experts from around the UK, including palliative care doctors, general practitioners, physician and nurse specialists in prion diseases, and a lived experience representative to compile practical, consensus-based recommendations for managing prion diseases, much of which can also be applied to other rapidly progressive dementias. In this article, we examine the available evidence base for managing various aspects of prion diseases. Where evidence is limited, we suggest best practices informed by decades of our collective experiences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.