Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42472513›Full record

ArticleRedox biology2026

NADPH oxidase 2 (NOX2)-independent inducers of neutrophil extracellular traps promote resolution of chronic inflammation.

M Euler, O Hattab, K Borah Slater, B Golub, R Selin, Z Cheng, Y A Maluje Villanueva, G H Özkan, G Bila, K Dutta and 16 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Redox biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors.

M EulerDepartment of Internal Medicine 3 - Rheumatology and Immunology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg and Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg and Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
O HattabDepartment of Internal Medicine 3 - Rheumatology and Immunology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg and Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg and Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
K Borah SlaterBiosciences, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, EX4 4QD, United Kingdom.
B GolubFriedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Department of Chemistry and Pharmacy, Organic Chemistry Chair II, Erlangen, Germany.
R SelinFriedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Department of Chemistry and Pharmacy, Organic Chemistry Chair II, Erlangen, Germany.
Z ChengDepartment of Internal Medicine 3 - Rheumatology and Immunology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg and Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg and Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
Y A Maluje VillanuevaMedical Systems Biology, Institute of Experimental Dermatology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, 23562, Germany.
G H ÖzkanFriedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Department of Chemistry and Pharmacy, Organic Chemistry Chair II, Erlangen, Germany.
G BilaInstitute of Cellular Biology and Pathology "Nicolae Simionescu", Bucharest, Romania; Department of Histology, Cytology and Embryology, Danylo Halytsky Lviv National Medical University, Lviv, 79010, Ukraine.
K DuttaUniversity of Luebeck, Department of Dermatology, Lübeck, 23562, Germany.
D WeidnerDepartment of Internal Medicine 3 - Rheumatology and Immunology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg and Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg and Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
E J HoffmannUniversity of Luebeck, Institute for Systemic Inflammation Research, Lübeck, 23562, Germany.
J FriscicUniversity of Luebeck, Institute for Systemic Inflammation Research, Lübeck, 23562, Germany.
C D SadikUniversity of Luebeck, Department of Dermatology, Lübeck, 23562, Germany.
T HarrerDepartment of Internal Medicine 3 - Rheumatology and Immunology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg and Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg and Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
J KöhlUniversity of Luebeck, Institute for Systemic Inflammation Research, Lübeck, 23562, Germany.
G SchettDepartment of Internal Medicine 3 - Rheumatology and Immunology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg and Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg and Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
L MunozDepartment of Internal Medicine 3 - Rheumatology and Immunology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg and Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg and Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
A FähnrichMedical Systems Biology, Institute of Experimental Dermatology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, 23562, Germany.
S MurthyUniversity of Luebeck, Department of Dermatology, Lübeck, 23562, Germany.
R Grieshaber-BouyerDepartment of Internal Medicine 3 - Rheumatology and Immunology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg and Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg and Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
M HerrmannDepartment of Internal Medicine 3 - Rheumatology and Immunology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg and Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg and Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
R BilyyInstitute of Cellular Biology and Pathology "Nicolae Simionescu", Bucharest, Romania; Department of Histology, Cytology and Embryology, Danylo Halytsky Lviv National Medical University, Lviv, 79010, Ukraine.
H R GriffithsSwansea University Medical School, Swansea University, Swansea, United Kingdom.
A MokhirFriedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Department of Chemistry and Pharmacy, Organic Chemistry Chair II, Erlangen, Germany.
M H HoffmannUniversity of Luebeck, Department of Dermatology, Lübeck, 23562, Germany; University of Luebeck, Institute for Systemic Inflammation Research, Lübeck, 23562, Germany. Electronic address: Markus.hoffmann@uni-luebeck.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) generated by NADPH oxidase 2 (NOX2) are essential for antimicrobial defense but also for the resolution of inflammation. NOX2 deficiency, as observed in chronic granulomatous disease (CGD), predisposes to persistent sterile inflammation. Current therapeutic strategies largely rely on nonspecific immunosuppression or require residual NOX2 activity, while systemic ROS-inducing therapies are limited by toxicity. Here, we present a NOX2-independent approach to restore inflammation-resolving ROS signaling using N-alkylaminoferrocene-based prodrugs (pro-NAAFs), which amplify pre-existing ROS rather than generating ROS indiscriminately. Among several candidates, prodrug 1 emerged as the most potent and well-tolerated ROS amplifier. In human neutrophils, prodrug 1 induced strong ROS production and neutrophil extracellular trap (NET) formation. These responses occurred independently of NOX2 and were maintained in CGD-derived neutrophils. Similar NOX2-independent ROS induction and NET formation were observed in immune cells from wild-type and NOX2-dysfunctional Ncf1∗∗ mice. Prodrug 1-induced NETs aggregated into high-density structures (aggNETs) capable of degrading pro-inflammatory mediators in vitro. Prodrug 1 also inhibited neutrophil inflammasome activation. In vivo, subcutaneous administration of prodrug 1 reduced inflammatory mediator levels in air pouches, promoted resolution of chronic arthritis in Ncf1∗∗ mice, and protected from bone destruction. Transcriptomic analyses indicated early suppression of inflammatory pathways and restoration of neutrophil maturation trajectories towards a wild-type-like state. While prodrug 1 increased protein oxidation markers, it shifted systemic oxysterol profiles towards an inflammation-resolving phenotype. These findings identify pro-NAAFs as NOX2-independent ROS amplifiers capable of restoring inflammatory resolution and highlight their therapeutic potential for chronic inflammatory conditions linked to NOX2-dysfunction.

Indexed as

Extracellular TrapsInflammationNADPH Oxidase 2NeutrophilsAnimalsGranulomatous Disease, ChronicHumansMiceProdrugsReactive Oxygen SpeciesCYBB protein, humanNADPH Oxidase 2ProdrugsReactive Oxygen SpeciesArthritisInflammationNETosisNOX2ProdrugsROS

Identifiers

PMID42472513
PMCPMC13393013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.