Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42472430›Full record

ArticleNursing philosophy : an international journal for healthcare professionals2026

Gadamerian Hermeneutic Philosophy and Caring Science.

Danielle Granderson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing philosophy : an international journal for healthcare professionals, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Danielle GrandersonChristine E. Lynn College of Nursing, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-5449-5610

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper examines the relevance of Gadamerian hermeneutic philosophy for caring science by clarifying how understanding, interpretation, and ethical responsiveness are implicated in nursing practice. Drawing on key Gadamerian concepts, including prejudice, language, dialog, and the fusion of horizons, the paper explores the ontological and epistemological foundations of caring as a relational process of coming to understanding within historically and culturally situated nurse-patient encounters. Caring is articulated not as a discrete action or technical competence, but as a mode of being that unfolds through dialogical engagement and openness to the other. While Gadamerian hermeneutics has been widely employed within qualitative nursing research, this paper argues that its significance for caring science lies less in methodological prescription than in its philosophical orientation to understanding and application as inseparable. By examining interpretive approaches to studying caring and critically reflecting on the tendency to treat the fusion of horizons as an endpoint, the paper highlights how Gadamerian hermeneutics sustains caring as an ongoing, ethically consequential practice rather than a finalized interpretive outcome. Clinical Trial Registration: N/A.

Indexed as

EmpathyHermeneuticsPhilosophy, NursingHumansNurse-Patient Relationscaring scienceepistemologyGadamerhermeneuticsnurse‐patient relationshipontology

Identifiers

PMID42472430
PMCPMC13380937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.