ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2026
Finite Element Modeling of Lower Limb Lymphedema: Influence of Limb Morphology and Compression Garment Classes on Internal Pressure Distribution.
Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeCompression therapy with medical graduated compression garments is commonly used in the treatment of leg lymphedema. However, the relationship between the interface pressure applied by the garment and the resulting hydrostatic pressure within the soft tissues remains poorly understood. Women commonly use thigh-high garments, whereas men often use knee-high compression garments, but the effects of these different garment types remain unclear. The objective of this study was to evaluate pressure transmission within lymphedematous legs and to assess the effects of different garment types.
methodsPatient-specific finite element models were developed from magnetic resonance imaging data of eight female and three male lymphedematous legs. The models explicitly represented the skin, fascia cruris, subcutaneous tissue, and muscle. Interface and hydrostatic pressures were quantified for class 2 and class 3 compression garments, as well as for three garment superimposition configurations.
resultsFor all legs wearing class 2 compression garments, and for female legs wearing class 3 compression garments, interface and hydrostatic pressures were below therapeutic ranges. Male legs wearing class 3 compression garments achieved hydrostatic pressure values within the therapeutic range due to higher garment stiffness. Superimposition of garments increased hydrostatic pressure in female legs and led to excessive compression in male legs.
conclusionThese findings highlight the influence of limb morphology and garment mechanical properties on compression therapy. Class 2 or class 3 garments alone may be insufficient for female patients, whereas superimposition should be applied cautiously in male patients. Patient-specific finite element analyses may support more individualized compression therapy prescriptions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42472417What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.