ReviewDiscover mental health2026
Comprehensive integration of mental health screening and triage with mental performance services through a sport science hub model in collegiate sport.
Review in Discover mental health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Collegiate sport environments often bring mental health (MH) and performance (MP) into close interaction; yet, screening, triage, referral, and MP support often remain operationally fragmented. This fragmentation may weaken follow-through after screening, limit coordination across clinical and performance services, and create uncertainty around privacy, scope boundaries, and accountability. In this Perspective, drawing on implementation science, integrated care, and systems-oriented organizational design, we suggest that a promising direction in athlete MH-MP support is not simply expanding screening availability, but building governed infrastructure that better connects identification to action. We propose a sport science hub model for coordinating two linked but distinct lanes: (1) structured MH screening, triage, and clinician-led referral workflows, and (2) MP profiling and skills-based support delivered within non-clinical scope. The model is organized around explicit guardrails, including role separation, privacy-secured and auditable access, non-punitive use protections, and emergency escalation pathways. We discuss the rationale for using structured screening and referral processes while acknowledging the limitations of current screening tools, including false-negative and false-positive concerns, and the importance of interpreting performance disruption in context rather than medicalizing normal variation. We conclude with governance principles and a forward-looking research agenda focused on implementation, trust, acceptability, screening accuracy, and prospective evaluation of integrated MH-MP systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.