Observational studyJournal of evaluation in clinical practice2026
Unexplored Factors in Medication Wastage: Investigating Economic Impact in a Brazilian Teaching Hospital.
Observational study in Journal of evaluation in clinical practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Unexplored Factors in Medication Wastage: Investigating Economic Impact in a Brazilian Teaching Hospital.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
rationaleMedication wastage is a persistent challenge in healthcare systems, yet the economic impact of syringe dead space (DS) and residual volume during routine medication administration remains underexplored outside the vaccine context. AIMS AND
objectivesTo investigate the economic impact of syringe dead space and residual volume on medication administration in a Brazilian teaching hospital.
methodA retrospective observational study was conducted using medication prescription data from 2022 at the Hospital de Clínicas da Universidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro, Brazil. All injectable medications were included. Medication cost per millilitre was calculated using hospital procurement records. Syringe sizes were defined according to prescribed volumes. Syringe dead space was measured using an analytical balance (ATY224, Shimadzu, Japan), and wasted volumes and financial losses were estimated. The medication wastage rate was calculated as the ratio between wasted value and total medication expenditure.
resultsA total of 120 medications met the inclusion criteria, accounting for 693,933 prescriptions. The estimated wasted volume due to residual volume was 41,394.47 mL. The top ten medications accounted for 51.72% of prescriptions and 48.18% of the wasted financial value. The overall hospital wastage rate was approximately 1.16%. Syringe dead space, frequency of medication administration, and cost per millilitre were identified as the main contributors to medication wastage.
conclusionSyringe dead space and residual volume constitute a measurable and avoidable source of medication loss, with relevant economic implications. These findings can inform procurement strategies, waste reduction interventions, and public health policies aimed at optimising healthcare resource use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.