Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42472306›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2026

Shumei Li, Heming Zhang, Xin Xing, Yuyang Wang, Ying Shao, Zhao Qi

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shumei LiAnhui Province Key Laboratory of Smart Agricultural Technology and Equipment, Hefei, China.
Heming ZhangAnhui Province Key Laboratory of Smart Agricultural Technology and Equipment, Hefei, China.
Xin XingAnhui Province Key Laboratory of Smart Agricultural Technology and Equipment, Hefei, China.
Yuyang WangAnhui Province Key Laboratory of Smart Agricultural Technology and Equipment, Hefei, China.
Ying ShaoAnhui Provincial Key Laboratory of Veterinary Pathobiology and Disease Control, Hefei, China.
Zhao QiAnhui Province Key Laboratory of Smart Agricultural Technology and Equipment, Hefei, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) have potential applications as probiotics, but the antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) and virulence factor genes (VFGs) they carry pose significant public health risks. In this study, eight strains of LAB were isolated from fecal samples of large-scale pig farms, and their probiotic potential and safety were systematically evaluated through in vitro functional assays and whole-genome sequencing. The results showed that

Indexed as

Genome, BacterialLactobacillalesProbioticsWhole Genome SequencingAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial AdhesionDrug Resistance, BacterialEnterococcus faeciumFecesLactiplantibacillus plantarumMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPediococcus pentosaceusSwineAnti-Bacterial AgentsGenomicsHorizontal gene transferLactic acid bacteriaMobile genetic elementsProbiotic biosafety

Identifiers

PMID42472306
PMCPMC13380237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.