Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42472175›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Artificial Intelligence in Hypertension Management: Promise Must Precede Practice.

Kunj R Ghantiwala, Ruchik Kevadiya, Pradeep Pentapurthy, Arpit R Thakor, Sarwan Kumar

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kunj R GhantiwalaMedicine, Gujarat Medical Education and Research Society (G.M.E.R.S.) Medical College, Navsari, Navsari, IND.
Ruchik KevadiyaInternal Medicine, Henry Ford Health System, Rochester Hills, USA.
Pradeep PentapurthyInternal Medicine, Wayne State University/Henry Ford Rochester Hospital, Rochester Hills, USA.
Arpit R ThakorMedicine, Larsen and Toubro Health and Dialysis Centre, Surat, IND.
Sarwan KumarInternal Medicine, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Rochester Hills, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hypertension remains one of the most important modifiable risk factors for cardiovascular disease worldwide, yet blood pressure control rates remain suboptimal despite advances in diagnosis and treatment. Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a promising tool to improve hypertension care through enhanced risk prediction, continuous monitoring, and clinical decision support. Enthusiasm surrounding AI must be balanced against challenges related to algorithmic bias, model interpretability, data quality, and clinical implementation. While AI has the potential to transform hypertension management, its greatest challenge is no longer predictive accuracy but successful integration into real-world clinical practice. This editorial discusses the opportunities and limitations of AI in hypertension care and argues that implementation science, transparency, and equitable deployment should become the next priorities for the field.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceblood pressure monitoringcardiovascular diseasehypertensionmachine learning

Identifiers

PMID42472175
PMCPMC13380408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.