ArticleCureus2026
Comparison of Modified Mallampati Score and Ultrasonographic Airway Assessment in Predicting Ease of Glottic Visualization: A Prospective Diagnostic Accuracy Study at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Pakistan.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe accuracy of preoperative airway assessment remains a challenging issue. The modified Mallampati (MP) scoring system has been commonly employed, though with poor predictive accuracy. The ultrasonographic measurement of skin-to-epiglottic distance (SED) has been proposed as an objective tool. We evaluated the accuracy of MP scoring and ultrasonographic measurement of SED in predicting easy glottic visualization based on Cormack-Lehane grading during direct laryngoscopy.
methodsThis prospective observational diagnostic accuracy study involved 400 adult patients who underwent elective surgery under general anesthesia with an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade of I and II. Preoperative MP score and SED by ultrasound examination were performed. The degree of glottic visualization was graded according to the Cormack-Lehane scale. Easy direct laryngoscopy was categorized as a Cormack-Lehane scale of I and II, while difficult direct laryngoscopy was categorized as a Cormack-Lehane scale of III and IV.
resultsA significant association was observed between SED and Cormack-Lehane (CL) grade (p < 0.001). The mean SED increased progressively with worsening CL grade (p < 0.001). The area under the ROC curve (AUC) for SED was 0.98 compared with 0.50 for the MP score. At a cutoff >19.5 mm, SED demonstrated 100% sensitivity and 89.95% specificity. The MP score (>3.5) showed sensitivity of 6.25% and specificity of 99.46%. On multivariable analysis, SED was the only independent predictor of difficult laryngoscopy (OR 11.29, 95% CI 4.24-30.07; p < 0.001).
conclusionUltrasonographic SED is a highly accurate and independent predictor of difficult glottic visualization and outperforms the modified Mallampati score. Incorporating airway ultrasound into routine preoperative assessments may improve the prediction of difficult glottic visualization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.