ReviewCureus2026
General Medicine as the Clinical Bridge: A Systematic Literature Review of Whole-Person Care, Multimorbidity Management, and Health System Integration.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Multimorbidity has become a major challenge for contemporary healthcare systems, as patients with multiple chronic conditions often require care that extends beyond disease-specific pathways. Fragmented services, polypharmacy, treatment burden, and poor continuity can limit the effectiveness of conventional clinical models. This review aimed to synthesize original evidence on whole-person care, multimorbidity management, and health system integration, with emphasis on the role of general medicine as a clinical bridge. A systematic search of electronic databases was conducted for original English-language studies published from 2016 onward. Study selection followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) approach, and 11 studies were included in the final qualitative synthesis. Data were extracted on study design, population, care model, outcomes, key findings, and relevance to integrated generalist care. No meta-analysis was performed because of heterogeneity in study designs, interventions, and outcome measures. The review found that general practice and primary care interventions commonly used extended consultations, relational continuity, individualized care plans, medication review, self-management support, interdisciplinary collaboration, and cross-sector coordination. Benefits were more consistent for patient-centered experience, emotional support, care coordination, medication-related processes, and health behaviors than for generic quality-of-life outcomes. General medicine appears central to translating fragmented multimorbidity care into coordinated, whole-person, and system-aware clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.