Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42472101›Full record

ArticleiScience2026

The naive brain detects face-to-face biological motion.

Anastasia Morandi-Raikova, Mirko Zanon, Giorgio Vallortigara

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anastasia Morandi-RaikovaCenter for Mind/Brain Sciences, University of Trento, Rovereto, Italy.
Mirko ZanonCenter for Mind/Brain Sciences, University of Trento, Rovereto, Italy.
Giorgio VallortigaraCenter for Mind/Brain Sciences, University of Trento, Rovereto, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Detecting agents and their interactions is a cornerstone of social cognition. Vertebrates are known to possess innate sensitivity to animacy cues, such as self-propelled or biological motion, supported by subpallial circuits within the social behavior network (SBN). However, the neural mechanisms distinguishing the detection of animate motion from the recognition of socially meaningful relations remain unclear. Using visually naive female domestic chicks, we investigated the brain regions activated when observing point-light displays of hens moving face-to-face or back-to-back, a behavioral paradigm previously shown to reveal spontaneous sensitivity to social interaction. We found selective immediate early-gene expression in the nidopallium caudolaterale, homologous to the mammalian prefrontal cortex, but not in the nucleus taeniae of the amygdala and septum, subpallial areas in the SBN. This pattern suggests that while basic sensitivity to animate motion may rely on evolutionarily ancient subpallial circuits, the detection of socially relevant relations engages higher order pallial processing.

Indexed as

agency perceptionanimacy detectionevolution of social cognitionpallial processingSocial predisposition

Identifiers

PMID42472101
PMCPMC13380427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.