Trial reportDrug design, development and therapy2026
Dexamethasone Alone versus Combined with Droperidol for Preventing Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in Gynecological Day Surgery Under Ciprofol-Alfentanil Anesthesia: A Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Trial.
Trial report in Drug design, development and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To compare the efficacy and safety of dexamethasone alone versus dexamethasone combined with droperidol for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in patients undergoing gynecological day surgery under ciprofol-alfentanil general anesthesia. Patients and Methods: A total of 268 patients scheduled for gynecological day surgery were randomly assigned to the DD group (dexamethasone-droperidol, n=134) or the DN group (dexamethasone-normal saline, n=134). Before induction of anesthesia, the DD group received 5 mg dexamethasone plus 1 mg droperidol, while the DN group received 5 mg dexamethasone plus normal saline. Anesthesia induction: ciprofol 0.5 mg/kg, alfentanil 20 μg/(kg·h), and mivacurium 0.2 mg/kg. Anesthesia maintenance: ciprofol 1.25 mg/(kg·h), alfentanil 40 μg/(kg·h), with bispectral index (BIS) maintained at 40-60. The primary outcome was the incidence of PONV within 24 h postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of adverse events within 24 h postoperatively, patient satisfaction, hemodynamic changes during anesthesia, BIS changes during anesthesia, and the incidence of intraoperative adverse events. Results: The incidence of PONV within 24 h postoperatively was significantly lower in the DD group than in the DN group (17.2% vs 31.9%), with a statistically significant difference. No significant differences were found between the two groups in the incidence of postoperative adverse events within 24 h, patient satisfaction, hemodynamic changes during anesthesia, BIS changes during anesthesia, or the incidence of intraoperative adverse events. No specific adverse effects of droperidol were observed in the DD group. Conclusion: For patients undergoing gynecological day surgery under ciprofol-alfentanil general anesthesia, the combination of dexamethasone and droperidol is significantly more effective than dexamethasone alone in preventing PONV, with no significant difference in safety between the two regimens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.