ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2026
Advancing stereotactic body radiotherapy through off-axis beam optimization to enable safer treatment of multi-isocenter coplanar targets.
Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and purpose: Oligometastatic lung cancer often requires multiple stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) courses for spatially distinct lesions, increasing the risk of field overlap and side effect. While beam optimization can reduce this risk, posterior lesions remain challenging due to gantry-couch collision constraints. Hence, an off-axis beam optimization framework was developed for posterior lung lesions with direct clinical relevance for coplanar, multi-isocenter SBRT, enabling safer and more efficient dose delivery. Materials and methods: Twenty-five posterior lung lesions were retrospectively analyzed. For each case, non-optimized, on-axis optimized, and off-axis optimized plans were generated. On-axis optimization preserved central-axis geometry, while off-axis optimization shifted the isocenter toward the midsagittal plane to avoid gantry-couch collision. Dose-volume metrics were compared, and plan efficiency was assessed using isodose line volume (IDLV, 2.5-25 Gy). In selected multi-isocenter cases, overlap between adjacent fields was evaluated. Results: Optimized beamsets reduced mean lung dose (2.5 ± 1.03 vs 2.3 ± 1 Gy), V Conclusions: Beam optimization reduces field overlap and OAR dose in multi-lesion SBRT while maintaining plan quality, with off-axis approaches enabling safe, collision-free treatment of posterior lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.