ArticleJournal of ophthalmology2026
Visual Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction With a New Trifocal, Toric Intraocular Lens.
Article in Journal of ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Visual Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction With a New Trifocal, Toric Intraocular Lens.Journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Describe visual outcomes, rotational stability, and patient experience with a new, trifocal, toric intraocular lens (IOL), CNWTTx (Alcon, Fort Worth, TX.). Patients and methods: Prospective, cohort study in a private practice in Salt Lake City, UT. Patients 45 years and older with visually significant cataracts, bilateral regular corneal astigmatism requiring a T3-T6 IOL power lens, no other significant eye disease undergoing sequential cataract surgery with Clareon PanOptix Toric IOL (CNWTTx) followed for 3 months postoperatively. Primary endpoints: monocular corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), distance-corrected intermediate visual acuity (DCIVA), and distance-corrected near visual acuity (DCNVA). Secondary endpoints: rotational position of the IOL and a patient satisfaction survey. Results: Twenty-five patients were recruited into the study and 22 received bilateral Clareon PanOptix Toric IOLs. At 3-month postoperative visit, visions were monocular mean CDVA of LogMAR (LM) 0.004, mean DCIVA of LM 0.110, and mean DCNVA of LM 0.056. 89% of patients had 0.5 diopters or less of residual astigmatism. Mean lens rotation was 1.67° at 1 month, and no lenses had rotated more than 5°. The majority of patients "never" used glasses at near (88%), at arm's length (100%) and at a distance (92%). In spite of 25% of patients noting photopic phenomena either "most of the time" or "always," a majority (88%) of patients were either "satisfied" or "very satisfied" with their vision, and 92% would have the same lens implanted again. Conclusion: The CNWTTx lens results in excellent visual acuities at distance, intermediate, and near, leading to high rates of spectacle independence. The lens is rotationally stable, and patients are subjectively satisfied with their visual outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.