ArticleFuture healthcare journal2026
Generalism and specialism: Reasserting the value of specialist knowledge in an era of multimorbidity.
Article in Future healthcare journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Beyond the right expert: Multimorbidity requires expertise in integration.Future healthcare journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Emphasis has increasingly been placed on expanding medical generalism in response to an ageing population and the rising prevalence of multimorbidity. While the ability to manage complex, undifferentiated illness across multiple conditions is undeniably important, modern healthcare is simultaneously becoming more technologically advanced and clinically specialised. Breakthroughs in diagnostics, therapeutics and procedural medicine demand deep, focused expertise to deliver safe and effective care, particularly for high-risk patients. Rather than viewing generalism and specialism as competing models, healthcare systems must recognise them as complementary. Generalists are essential for holistic assessment, coordination and continuity, while specialists provide advanced interventions and nuanced disease-specific management. In an era defined by both multimorbidity and rapid medical innovation, the central challenge is not to prioritise one approach over the other, but to strike an appropriate balance which ensures that patients receive the right expertise at the right time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.