ArticlePEC innovation2026
Evaluating the effect of an e-learning program designed to teach health care practitioners to inform patients with a model drawn from motivational interviewing: A pilot randomized controlled trial.
Article in PEC innovation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: We tested the effect of a 1.5-h e-learning course, which presents a new model for information-giving based on Motivational Interviewing, on practitioners' skills to inform patients. Methods: Thirty-two physicians and nurses at Lausanne University Hospital participated in a pilot randomized controlled trial to assess the impact of the e-learning on performance during an encounter with a simulated patient (SP). Participants were randomized (1:1) to complete the e-learning before (intervention) or after (control) the SP encounter. Encounters were coded using an adapted version of the validated MITI (Motivational Interviewing Treatment Integrity) coding scale. Analyses compared group differences and explored effects by clinical experience. Results: The intervention group showed significantly better communication behaviors when delivering information, using less persuasion and more collaborative strategies (e.g., asking permission, checking understanding, eliciting patient reaction). Effects varied by experience level, with less experienced practitioners showing greater effects in empathy, partnership, seeking collaboration and use of open questions. Conclusion: The e-learning impacted the way providers inform patients and shows promise as an effective tool for skill development, especially among less experienced practitioners.Innovation: This study introduces a novel framework for conceptualizing and teaching information delivery as a structured interactive process and provides an institution-wide program for all staff involved in patient communication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.