ArticleArthroplasty today2026
When Does Hip Dysfunction and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement Peak After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty?
Article in Arthroplasty today, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The Hip dysfunction and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (HOOS, JR) metric has been increasingly utilized to evaluate pain and function following total hip arthroplasty (THA); however, less is known about when these scores reach a maximum. The purpose of this study was to determine when HOOS, JR scores peak and surpass established clinical thresholds. Methods: A cloud-based patient engagement platform was queried for all HOOS, JR responses before and after elective primary THA at our institution. This resulted in a total of 8615 responses from 1866 THAs collected between December 2019 and March 2024. Procedures were performed between January 2011 and March 2024. Surveys were collected preoperatively and at 4 weeks, 4 months, and 1, 2, 5, and 10 years postoperatively. Primary outcomes included time points when HOOS, JR peaked, and when clinically important improvements were achieved. Survey responses were analyzed to compare recovery times for specific pain and function parameters. Results: Statistically significant ( Conclusions: The statistical peak in HOOS, JR scores after primary THA occurred around 1-year follow-up, and most clinically meaningful improvements occurred by 4 months. Patients can expect early meaningful improvements walking on an uneven surface and can expect prolonged difficulty with bending to the floor. Clinicians may incorporate this information to better set patient expectations and encourage their postoperative rehabilitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.