ArticleAmerican heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice2026
Ultrasound-guided management in heart failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating lung and inferior vena cava ultrasound for reducing readmissions and mortality.
Article in American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Hospital admissions due to HF exacerbations often occur due to vascular congestion. With point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) becoming more prevalent, this systematic review was performed to identify its utility by using lung and/or IVC ultrasound to visualize vascular congestion to decrease all-cause mortality and/or hospital readmissions. Objective: To determine whether ultrasound-guided management using lung and/or IVC ultrasound reduces hospital readmissions and all-cause mortality in patients with HF compared to standard care. Data sources: Seven RCTs, published between 2019 and 2024, were identified through systematic searches of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. Study selection: Two reviewers independently screened studies using PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Eligible studies were RCTs enrolling adults with HF in which diuretic therapy was guided by lung and/or IVC ultrasound, compared to standard care, reporting all-cause mortality or HF-related readmission. Studies were excluded if non-randomized, non-English, echocardiography-only, or involving pediatric populations. Data extraction and synthesis: Data extraction was manually performed and included study characteristics, participant demographics, ultrasound modality, and outcome measures. A DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model was applied to account for clinical and methodological heterogeneity. Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcomes, planned prior to data collection, included all-cause mortality and hospital readmissions for patients admitted for HF exacerbations when utilizing ultrasound-guided management versus standard care. The data was pooled and measured using a random-effects model to calculate RR with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: From the seven RCTs ( Conclusions and relevance: Seven RCTs totaling 824 patients showed that ultrasound-guided HF management significantly cut readmission risk without improving survival. A larger numerical reduction in the combined LUS + IVC subgroup is exploratory only based on two small trials and requires prospective confirmation before influencing clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.