ReviewIBRO neuroscience reports2026
Advances in imaging studies of contusion penumbra.
Review in IBRO neuroscience reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a serious human health hazard. The contusion penumbra (CP) is the area of injury that lies between the core of the injury and normal-looking brain tissue. CP is the main site where secondary injury occurs. Additionally, it offers a major therapeutic target for preserving neurological function post-TBI. Using different imaging modalities, specific cellular and tissue changes in CP as well as contusion core and surrounding normal brain tissue were evaluated. Even though the existing imaging techniques are widely used in clinics, these techniques often do not characterize the cellular and histopathological changes in the CP accurately. The fundamental absence of uniform assessment criteria can lead to inconsistent clinical decisions, which would not be favourable to patients. As such, improving imaging techniques will be important to truly reflect better the changing pathophysiology of the CP. Revising these techniques could allow for more homogeneous clinical results and improve therapeutic decision making to enhance health outcomes in neurology. We conducted a comprehensive review of literature on the abilities and limitations of imaging methods used in CP studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.