ArticleISME communications2026
Phytoplankton phenology through gene expression during the North Atlantic spring bloom decline.
Article in ISME communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While phytoplankton dynamics in the annual North Atlantic spring bloom have been well characterized, the physiological underpinnings driving these changes and their net impact on the biogeochemistry of the region are less understood. Phytoplankton metabolism is both affected by and influences the region's nutrient cycling, primary production, and ultimately, the fate of carbon export. Thus, developing an understanding of these processes is critical. Phytoplankton biomass, biological rates, and gene expression data along with associated environmental parameters were measured as part of the NASA EXport Processes in the Ocean from RemoTe Sensing program's campaign to the North Atlantic to evaluate the relationships amongst these processes within the four most dominant phytoplankton groups (diatoms, dinoflagellates, haptophytes, and chlorophytes) during the spring bloom. We observe a transition from a period dominated by active diatom growth (defined as Phase I) to a period dominated by non-diatom phytoplankton groups (Phase II). Silicic acid depletion appears to limit overall production and reduce competition from diatoms, likely leading to enhanced contributions of haptophytes in Phase II. Expression of key protein-encoding genes involved in cell maintenance, photosynthesis, and nitrogen and vitamin metabolisms varied amongst the taxa throughout the observation period. Expression patterns of diatom genes involved in silicon transport are uncoupled from those involved in nitrate assimilation and photosynthesis, suggesting a change in growth that may be uncoupled from silicification. Our analysis demonstrates how variable silicic acid concentrations can have a significant effect on phytoplankton community structure and regulate primary production, aiding in overall bloom decline.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.