ArticleBiochemistry and biophysics reports2026
Establishment and characterization of a mouse model of cisplatin-induced olfactory aversion.
Article in Biochemistry and biophysics reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chemotherapy-induced sensory alterations, including changes in taste and smell, have been reported as adverse effects of anticancer treatments. However, olfactory aversion has received little attention, and its underlying mechanisms remain unclear, limiting effective preventive or therapeutic strategies. Therefore, chemotherapy-induced olfactory aversion was investigated using cisplatin, a widely used anticancer drug. Three odorants-vanillin, benzaldehyde, and isoamyl acetate-were presented to C57BL/6J mice as conditioned stimuli together with cisplatin-induced visceral malaise (30 μg, intraperitoneal) to induce olfactory aversion. Odor preference was assessed using a two-bottle test. Cisplatin-treated mice exhibited altered preferences for all odor solutions and reduced total fluid intake compared with saline-treated controls. Meanwhile, no olfactory aversion was observed in zinc sulfate-induced anosmic male mice. Notably, female mice showed weaker olfactory aversion than male mice, suggesting a possible sex difference. These results established a cisplatin-induced olfactory-aversion mouse model. No structural abnormalities were observed in the olfactory epithelium of olfactory-aversion model mice following cisplatin treatment. In contrast, c-Fos immunostaining revealed increased neuronal activity in the septal region, whereas c-Fos expression in the lateral septum showed a similar but non-significant trend following vanillin administration to mice with established vanillin aversion. These findings suggest that central neural mechanisms may be associated with cisplatin-induced olfactory aversion, although the involvement of peripheral olfactory processes cannot be excluded. This study provides new insights into the neural correlates of chemotherapy-induced olfactory aversion and may aid the development of future therapeutic strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.