Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42471813›Full record

ReviewNorth American Spine Society journal2026

Degenerative lumbar scoliosis with stenosis: how should Cobb angle inform decompression versus fusion? A systematic review.

Deya AlWady, Spyridon Komaitis, Mohammed Shakil Patel, Khalid Salem, Nasir Quraishi, Konstantinos Zygogiannis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in North American Spine Society journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Deya AlWadyCentre for Spinal Studies and Surgery (CSSS) D Floor, West Block Queen's Medical Centre (QMC), Derby Road, Nottingham NG7 2UH, United Kingdom.
Spyridon KomaitisCentre for Spinal Studies and Surgery (CSSS) D Floor, West Block Queen's Medical Centre (QMC), Derby Road, Nottingham NG7 2UH, United Kingdom.
Mohammed Shakil PatelCentre for Spinal Studies and Surgery (CSSS) D Floor, West Block Queen's Medical Centre (QMC), Derby Road, Nottingham NG7 2UH, United Kingdom.
Khalid SalemCentre for Spinal Studies and Surgery (CSSS) D Floor, West Block Queen's Medical Centre (QMC), Derby Road, Nottingham NG7 2UH, United Kingdom.
Nasir QuraishiCentre for Spinal Studies and Surgery (CSSS) D Floor, West Block Queen's Medical Centre (QMC), Derby Road, Nottingham NG7 2UH, United Kingdom.
Konstantinos ZygogiannisCentre for Spinal Studies and Surgery (CSSS) D Floor, West Block Queen's Medical Centre (QMC), Derby Road, Nottingham NG7 2UH, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS) with stenosis is a three-dimensional disorder in which the magnitude of the coronal curve informs, but does not, by itself, determine operative planning. Objective: To assess how the preoperative Cobb angle should be interpreted when choosing decompression alone versus fusion in adults with DLS and stenosis. Methods: Ovid MEDLINE and Embase databases were searched from 1996 to April 25, 2025. The search in Ovid was created by combining keyword and subject heading terms for adult degenerative scoliosis/adult spinal deformity, lumbar scoliosis, Cobb angle, stenosis, decompression, and fusion. Studies eligible for inclusion were adult surgical cohorts that either provided explicit data on preoperative Cobb angles or included patients based on a preoperative Cobb angle threshold, and that reported at least one outcome measure following surgery for decompression and/or fusion. Cohorts consisting of mixed populations were excluded unless an analysis of the appropriate subset of adults with DLS could be performed independently. Heterogeneous studies were synthesized using narrative methods. Results: Four observational studies met the inclusion criteria. In mild curves, generally below 20°, decompression alone produced acceptable outcomes when stenosis predominated and instability was limited. In the limited comparative evidence, fusion appeared more favorable when curves were larger or when mechanical features such as instability or more substantial deformity were present. Across the included studies, important modifiers beyond Cobb angle included foraminal stenosis, lateral listhesis, disc wedging, and sagittal alignment. Follow-up ranged from approximately 1 to 4.6 years. Conclusions: Cobb angle is a useful decision aid, but not a stand-alone indication. Operative choice in DLS with stenosis should integrate curve magnitude with stenosis pattern, instability, sagittal alignment, symptoms, comorbidity, frailty, and the expected burden of surgery.

Indexed as

Adult spinal deformityCobb angleDecompressionDegenerative lumbar scoliosisFusionLumbar stenosis

Identifiers

PMID42471813
PMCPMC13380521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.