ArticleInterventional pain medicine2026
High versus low-voltage pulsed radiofrequency of the suprascapular nerve for chronic shoulder pain: A randomized pilot clinical trial.
Article in Interventional pain medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Chronic shoulder pain refractory to conservative treatment remains a common and challenging clinical condition. Pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) of the suprascapular nerve (SSN) is a well-established interventional technique, typically applied at 45 V. Emerging evidence suggests that higher voltages may enhance clinical outcomes. This exploratory pilot study aimed to compare changes in pain and function after high-voltage (100 V) versus low-voltage (45 V) PRF of the SSN. Methods: A prospective, randomized, single-center, assessor-blinded pilot clinical trial was conducted. Twenty patients with chronic rotator cuff tendinopathy, baseline Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ≥7, and refractory to conservative treatment were included. Patients were randomly assigned to receive PRF of the SSN at either 45 V or 100 V, with identical technical parameters (360 s, 42 °C). Pain (VAS) and function (QuickDASH) were evaluated at baseline, 1 month, and 6 months. Results: The 100 V group showed larger observed reductions in pain compared with the 45 V group at both 1 month (between-group difference: 2.7 points; p = 0.011) and 6 months (between-group difference: 2.46 points; p = 0.022). A similar pattern was observed for QuickDASH scores. Improvements in the 45 V group were smaller and did not reach statistical significance. No serious procedure-related adverse events were recorded. Conclusions: In this exploratory pilot trial, high-voltage (100 V) PRF of the suprascapular nerve was associated with larger improvements in pain and function than 45 V PRF, although efficacy findings remain exploratory and require confirmation in larger controlled trials. No serious procedure-related adverse events were observed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.