ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2026
Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction in skeletally immature patients: distal versus proximal femoral physis fixation.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo compare clinical outcomes and complications of medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction using femoral fixation proximal versus distal to the physis in skeletally immature patients with patellar instability.
methodsThis retrospective study included 23 skeletally immature patients (24 knees) undergoing isolated MPFL reconstruction from January 2021 to August 2024. Patients were divided into proximal (n = 12 knees, mean age 14.1 ± 0.9 years ) and distal (n = 12 knees, mean age 13.8 ± 1.6 years ) physis fixation groups. Preoperative imaging assessed patellar height, trochlear dysplasia, and the tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance. Clinical outcomes (Tegner, Kujala, Lysholm and International Knee Documentation Committee [IKDC]) and complications (re-dislocation, patellar fracture, infection, stiffness, quadriceps weakness and growth disturbance) were compared.
resultsThe mean follow-up durations were 24.4 ± 4.3 months (range, 17-33) in the proximal group and 22.8 ± 4.7 months (range, 17-30) in the distal group (P = 0.374). Both groups showed significant improvements in all functional outcomes (P < 0.001) with no intergroup differences (P > 0.05). Subjective satisfaction was similar (8.5 vs. 8.3, P = 0.726). Return to sport occurred in 91.7% of both groups. Complication rates were numerically higher in the proximal group (41.7%; mainly knee pain (n = 3, 25%) and quadriceps weakness (n = 2, 16.7%) than in the distal group (24.9%; infection (n = 1, 8.3%), pain (n = 1, 8.3%), weakness (n = 1, 8.3%)(P = 0.667). No redislocations, patellar fractures, stiffness, or growth disturbances occurred.
conclusionsBoth proximal and distal femoral physis fixation for MPFL reconstruction yield similar clinical outcomes and complication rates in skeletally immature patients. However, due to the limited sample size of this study, the current conclusion should be interpreted with caution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.