ArticleBMC nursing2026
Training status, needs, and factors associated with prior participation in phase II cardiac rehabilitation exercise prescription training among cardiopulmonary rehabilitation nurses: a cross-sectional study with an exploratory nomogram analysis.
Article in BMC nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPhase II cardiac rehabilitation is essential for patient recovery, and nurses play a central role in implementing exercise prescriptions. However, training systems for this competency remain underdeveloped in China. This study examined the training status and self-reported training needs of nurses working in cardiopulmonary rehabilitation settings, and explored factors associated with prior formal participation in phase II cardiac rehabilitation exercise prescription training. An exploratory nomogram was further developed as a preliminary tool for characterizing differences in prior formal participation
methodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted from September to October 2024 among 281 nurses from cardiopulmonary rehabilitation centers in eight hospitals across Guangxi, Yunnan, and Sichuan using purposive sampling. Data were collected through a self-developed electronic questionnaire covering participant characteristics, training status, and training needs. Prior formal participation in phase II cardiac rehabilitation exercise prescription training was used as the outcome variable. A theory-informed analytical strategy that combined a DAG, univariable logistic regression, and multivariable logistic regression was used to identify associated factors and construct an exploratory nomogram. Internal validation was performed using a 7:3 training-validation split, and model performance was assessed in terms of discrimination and calibration for describing differences in prior formal participation.
resultsAlthough respondents reported high awareness of phase II cardiac rehabilitation exercise prescription training and strong institutional support, prior formal participation remained insufficient. Existing programs were largely theory-based, with limited practical components and incomplete alignment with clinical needs. Nurses reported substantial demand for further training and generally preferred small-group, blended, and practice-oriented formats. In the multivariable model, age, city, sex, professional title, and cardiopulmonary rehabilitation experience were retained as factors associated with prior formal participation. The nomogram showed moderate discrimination in the training set (AUC=0.77, 95% CI: 0.71-0.84) and acceptable discrimination in the validation set (AUC=0.71, 95% CI: 0.60-0.83), with acceptable calibration in both sets (H-L P = 0.548 and 0.665, respectively).
conclusionNurses working in cardiopulmonary rehabilitation settings reported clear unmet training needs related to phase II cardiac rehabilitation exercise prescription training. The exploratory nomogram showed moderate discrimination and acceptable calibration for estimating prior formal participation and may help characterize subgroup differences in prior formal participation. Given the cross-sectional design, the historical nature of the outcome, and the lack of external validation, these findings should be interpreted with caution. CLINICAL
trial registrationNot applicable REPORTING
methodThis study was reported in accordance with the STROBE checklist. Because the nomogram was retained, model development and reporting were additionally guided by the TRIPOD statement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.