ArticleBMC women's health2026
The interplay of risk and protective factors for psychosocial outcome in women after induced abortion - an interview study from Germany.
Article in BMC women's health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAbortions are one of the most common gynecological treatments worldwide. Although many studies investigate risk factors (RF) for a negative abortion-related psychosocial outcome (APO), less is known about protective factors (PF) and the interplay of RFs and PFs.
methodsFrom May to August 2022, we conducted a semi-structured interview study in Germany and interviewed 23 women (21-43 years) who had undergone an elective abortion within the last 12 months, asking them about their experiences, perceived RF, PF and APO. The data was analyzed using qualitative content analysis.
resultsWe found three different patterns: The first group of women found the process, especially the legal requirements, stressful but reported a mostly positive outcome with sufficient social support as PF. Women who reported neuroticism-related personality factors as RF sought less social support and more frequently used emotion-focused coping strategies such as self-care and distraction and often showed a mixed outcome. A third group of women experienced intimate partner violence (IPV) and also reported distraction as PF. Regardless, all women who survived IPV reported a negative APO.
conclusionsThe majority of women find the legal requirements (e.g., mandatory counseling, waiting periods) burdensome. At the same time, they offer no benefit to women who find themselves in critical situations such as coercion and domestic violence, which was a major RF. The protection of women who survived IPV should therefore be improved and the access to abortion improved. Further research is needed to include effects on more vulnerable groups such as migrants or queer individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.