ArticleBMC women's health2026
Physiotherapy and rehabilitation for survivors of female genital mutilation/cutting: a scoping review.
Article in BMC women's health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFemale genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C) affects more than 230 million girls and women worldwide and is associated with chronic pelvic pain, pelvic floor dysfunction, lower urinary tract symptoms, psychosexual dysfunction, and reduced quality of life. Although physiotherapy and rehabilitation may contribute to multidisciplinary care, the available evidence has not been comprehensively synthesised.
objectiveTo map the existing evidence on physiotherapy and rehabilitation for women living with FGM/C and identify evidence gaps relevant to clinical practice and future research.
methodsA scoping review was conducted following the Arksey and O'Malley framework, Levac et al.'s methodological enhancements, and PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Electronic databases and grey literature were searched from inception to January 2026. Eligible studies included adolescent (≥ 15 years) and adult women living with FGM/C, together with rehabilitation-relevant studies involving healthcare professionals. Data were charted and synthesised narratively.
resultsOf 872 records identified, 21 studies met the inclusion criteria. Most evidence was observational or descriptive, with only one randomized controlled trial and one rehabilitation-focused case report directly evaluating rehabilitation interventions. Frequently reported rehabilitation-related impairments included psychosexual dysfunction, chronic pelvic pain, pelvic floor dysfunction, lower urinary tract symptoms, dyspareunia, and reduced quality of life. Reported rehabilitation approaches included pelvic floor rehabilitation, bladder retraining, biofeedback, psychosexual rehabilitation, and multidisciplinary care. Only one study included adolescents, and none specifically evaluated rehabilitation interventions for this population.
conclusionWomen living with FGM/C experience substantial rehabilitation needs affecting physical, psychosexual, urinary, and psychosocial health. Although physiotherapy and rehabilitation are increasingly recognised as important components of multidisciplinary care, direct evidence evaluating rehabilitation interventions remains limited. Future research should prioritise rehabilitation-focused intervention studies, implementation research, and standardised outcome measures to strengthen the evidence base and inform comprehensive, survivor-centred care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.