ArticleBMC psychology2026
Unpacking the within-person and between-person dynamics of physical activity and bedtime procrastination: a random intercept cross-lagged mediation model of self-control.
Article in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBedtime procrastination has emerged as a pervasive health risk behavior among young adults, whereas physical activity represents a fundamental health-promoting behavior. Although the strength model of self-control theoretically suggests that engaging in physical activity may replenish the self-regulatory resources necessary to resist evening procrastination, empirical evidence remains inconclusive. Previous cross-sectional and traditional cross-lagged studies have consistently confounded stable, trait-like differences between individuals with dynamic, state-like fluctuations within individuals. This study aimed to disentangle these effects to investigate the dynamic longitudinal interaction among physical activity, self-control, and bedtime procrastination.
methodsA three-wave longitudinal survey design with one-month intervals was employed. A final matched sample of 385 undergraduate students (mean age = 20.45 years; 53.8% female) completed validated self-report measures assessing physical activity, self-control, and bedtime procrastination across all three time points. To isolate intra-individual temporal dynamics from time-invariant baseline characteristics, the data were analyzed utilizing a random intercept cross-lagged panel model (RI-CLPM), controlling for chronotype and time-varying perceived stress.
resultsAt the between-person (trait) level, the random intercepts revealed that average physical activity was significantly and positively correlated with average self-control (r = .41, p < .001) and negatively correlated with average bedtime procrastination (r = - .35, p < .001). Crucially, at the within-person (state) level, a significant temporal cascade emerged. An intra-individual increase in physical activity at Time 1 was prospectively associated with an increase in self-control at Time 2 (β = 0.18, p < .01), which subsequently predicted a decrease in bedtime procrastination at Time 3 (β = -0.24, p < .001). Monte Carlo simulations confirmed a significant within-person longitudinal mediation effect (95% CI [- 0.082, - 0.015]).
conclusionThe findings provide prospective longitudinal evidence that health-promoting and health risk behaviors covary dynamically over time in association with shared cognitive resources. State-level increases in physical activity were prospectively associated with subsequent reductions in bedtime procrastination, potentially through enhanced self-control capacity. These results highlight the practical utility of cross-domain interventions, suggesting that daytime physical exertion may serve as a potential target for interventions aiming to reduce nocturnal self-regulatory failures. These conclusions should be interpreted with caution, given the observational nature of the design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.