ArticleBMC nursing2026
Nurses' perceptions of family presence during resuscitation/CPR in emergency departments in Palestine: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn this study, the perception of nurses towards the presence of the family during the cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) procedure in the Palestinian emergency room was investigated. Family involvement is increasingly encouraged to support the patient emotionally, although it creates some concerns.
methodsA descriptive cross-sectional design was employed in the West Bank to collect data from 150 nurses working in governmental and non-governmental institutions. Data collection was done using a systematic questionnaire. It included demographic data and perceptions about the presence of family during CPR.
resultsThe study examined opinions on family attendance during CPR in Palestinian EDs, consisting of 150 participants. Positive perception (> 2.1) was indicated by a total mean perception score of 2.22 (SD = 0.579). Participants were found to have a positive opinion on staff knowledge and family attendance in terminally ill patients, however, concerns were reported regarding patient comfort, appropriateness of family presence during resuscitation, and perceived benefits. No significant differences in perception were found in relation to years of experience, gender, age, occupation, or educational level. However, a significant difference in perception was found in relation to type of institution, with a p-value of 0.022, where participants from non-governmental hospitals scored higher than those from governmental hospitals, with a mean of 2.42 (SD = 0.67) and 2.17 (SD = 0.54), respectively.
conclusionThe study emphasizes the need for protocols, training, and cultural sensitivity in balancing the effectiveness of CPR with family-centered care. Resolution of these issues can help in improving attitudes and integrating family presence in CPR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.