ArticleBMC public health2026
Factors associated with quiet quitting among public health specialists in Türkiye: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundQuiet quitting, a passive disengagement involving minimal work effort, has surged post-pandemic amid workloads, burnout, and undervaluation, particularly in healthcare. Despite their critical role in health management, public health specialists in Türkiye often face role ambiguity and limited administrative authority, potentially fostering 'quiet quitting'-a state of passive disengagement. The aim of this study is to evaluate quiet quitting attitudes and identify associated factors among public health specialists in Türkiye.
methodsA cross-sectional online study was conducted from August 1 to September 30, 2024, targeting 601 Ministry of Health public health specialists. A simple random sample of eligible public health specialists was invited to participate in an online survey, and 241 completed a questionnaire comprising a Personal Information Form (sociodemographics, work characteristics, satisfaction) and the Quiet Quitting Attitude Scale (QQAS). The questionnaire was pilot-tested, and informed consent was obtained. Chi-square, Student's t, ANOVA, Mann-Whitney U, Kruskal-Wallis, post-hoc analyses, Logistic and linear regression were applied in the evaluation of the data.
resultsOf the participants, 18.2% viewed the future of public health in Türkiye as very hopeful or hopeful, 34.5% considered changing their specialty, 38.2% wanted a transfer from their current province, and 27.8% considered resigning. In the logistic regression model (QQAS ≥ 103), being aged 40 years or older, absence of an administrative position (OR = 6.73, 95% CI: 3.20-14.16), perceiving specialty training as incompatible with the field, a hopeless outlook on the specialty's future (OR = 9.56, 95% CI: 3.17-28.82), and desires for transfer and resignation were independently associated with higher quiet quitting attitudes. In the linear regression model, the same factors were significant, with the addition of 4-6 years of specialist experience and dissatisfaction with the public health specialty. Marital status, presence of psychiatric illness, and total medical experience were significant in univariate analyses but did not retain independent associations in the multivariate models.
conclusionQuiet quitting attitudes among public health specialists were associated with professional hopelessness and role-education mismatch. These findings suggest that targeted institutional efforts to better align job descriptions with specialist training and to improve career outlooks may help sustain workforce engagement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.