ArticleBMC pulmonary medicine2026
Association between plasma transfusion and in-hospital mortality in severe pneumonia: a propensity score-matched retrospective cohort study.
Article in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPlasma transfusion is used in patients with severe pneumonia who develop coagulopathy or bleeding, but recipients are often sicker than non-recipients. We evaluated the association between plasma transfusion and in-hospital mortality after adjustment for available measured confounders, while recognizing that unmeasured confounding from transfusion indications and illness severity may persist.
methodsThis single-center retrospective cohort included 156 adults with severe pneumonia admitted between January 2021 and May 2024; 62 received plasma and 94 did not. The matched mortality comparison using propensity score matching (PSM) and McNemar analysis was prespecified as the primary analysis. Supportive and exploratory analyses included Cox regression, Kaplan-Meier analysis, IPTW, overlap weighting, Fine-Gray modeling, E-value analysis, and exploratory coagulation-enhanced, logistic, microbiological/coagulation, and time-dependent exposure sensitivity analyses.
resultsBefore matching, mortality was higher among plasma recipients than controls (64.5% vs. 28.0%; crude odds ratio [OR] 4.69, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.35-9.34; p < 0.001), with substantial baseline imbalance. After matching, mortality remained numerically higher in the plasma group (50.0% vs. 36.1%) but was not statistically significant (matched OR 1.62, 95% CI 0.67-3.92; McNemar p = 0.383). Cox models yielded attenuated HRs after adjustment, but the fully adjusted model violated the global proportional hazards assumption; therefore, Cox estimates were interpreted as time-weighted associations over follow-up rather than constant effects. Exploratory sensitivity estimates varied in direction across estimands: coagulation-enhanced matching yielded OR 1.50 (95% CI 0.53-4.21), full-cohort logistic regression yielded adjusted OR 3.19 (95% CI 1.12-9.11), approximate adjusted time-dependent Cox analysis yielded HR 1.73 (95% CI 0.85-3.51), and strict verified-date adjusted time-dependent Cox analysis yielded HR 2.67 (95% CI 1.38-5.16).
conclusionsThe attenuation of the crude mortality difference after propensity score matching is consistent with baseline severity and confounding by indication accounting for a substantial component of the unadjusted association; however, residual confounding cannot be excluded. Because residual confounding, immortal-time bias, related time-dependent exposure bias, and proportional-hazards violations remain important limitations, these data do not establish a definitive beneficial or harmful effect of plasma transfusion. The non-significant matched result reflects limited statistical power (approximately 25% for a paired OR of 2.0) and should not be interpreted as evidence of no effect.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.