Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42471636›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2026

AMIUgraph: analysis and modeling of interactions for utility-driven benchmarking of graph-based models in healthcare.

Paolo Sorino, Alessandro De Bellis, Daniele Malitesta, Domenico Lofù, Caterina Bonfiglio, Rossella Donghia, Gianluigi Giannelli, Antonio Ferrara, Fedelucio Narducci, Tommaso Di Noia and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Paolo Sorino *Department of Electrical and Information Engineering (DEI), Politecnico di Bari, Via Orabona 4, 70126, Bari, Italy. paolo.sorino@poliba.it.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9081-2648
Alessandro De Bellis *Department of Electrical and Information Engineering (DEI), Politecnico di Bari, Via Orabona 4, 70126, Bari, Italy.
Daniele Malitesta *LUISS Guido Carli University, Viale Romania 32, 00197, Rome, Italy.
Domenico LofùDepartment of Electrical and Information Engineering (DEI), Politecnico di Bari, Via Orabona 4, 70126, Bari, Italy.
Caterina BonfiglioData Science Unit, National Institute of Gastroenterology - IRCCS "Saverio de Bellis", IRCCS Hospital, Via Turi 27, 70013, Castellana Grotte, Italy.
Rossella DonghiaData Science Unit, National Institute of Gastroenterology - IRCCS "Saverio de Bellis", IRCCS Hospital, Via Turi 27, 70013, Castellana Grotte, Italy.
Gianluigi GiannelliData Science Unit, National Institute of Gastroenterology - IRCCS "Saverio de Bellis", IRCCS Hospital, Via Turi 27, 70013, Castellana Grotte, Italy.
Antonio FerraraDepartment of Electrical and Information Engineering (DEI), Politecnico di Bari, Via Orabona 4, 70126, Bari, Italy.
Fedelucio NarducciDepartment of Electrical and Information Engineering (DEI), Politecnico di Bari, Via Orabona 4, 70126, Bari, Italy.
Tommaso Di NoiaDepartment of Electrical and Information Engineering (DEI), Politecnico di Bari, Via Orabona 4, 70126, Bari, Italy.
Eugenio Di SciascioDepartment of Electrical and Information Engineering (DEI), Politecnico di Bari, Via Orabona 4, 70126, Bari, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGraph-based machine learning approaches, including Knowledge Graph Embedding (KGE) methods and Graph Neural Networks (GNNs), have emerged as powerful tools for modeling complex biomedical data. However, a systematic and clinically grounded comparison of these approaches across heterogeneous healthcare graphs, accounting for both predictive performance and real-world deployment constraints, is still lacking.

methodsWe introduce AMIUGraph, a comprehensive benchmarking framework for healthcare link prediction that integrates real-world clinical data with external biomedical knowledge bases. AMIUGraph evaluates eight state-of-the-art models, of which four are knowledge graph embedding (KGE) methods DistMult, CP, ComplEx, and ConvE and four are graph neural network (GNN) architectures GCN, GraphSAGE, GAT, and GIN. The models are evaluated across three heterogeneous bipartite graphs representing Patients-Diseases, Diseases-Drugs, and Drugs-Targets interactions. Models are assessed under both transductive and inductive learning settings using accuracy, AUC, precision, recall, F1-score, and training time as evaluation metrics.

resultsExperimental results show that model performance is strongly influenced by graph structure and sparsity. GNNs consistently achieve superior predictive performance on sparse interaction graphs, particularly for Diseases-Drugs and Drugs-Targets prediction tasks. In contrast, KGE models demonstrate competitive accuracy with substantially lower computational costs in inductive clinical scenarios involving unseen patients. These trends are especially relevant in clinically realistic settings characterized by multimorbidity, such as gastrointestinal and liver diseases, where frequent patient updates and complex therapeutic interactions are common.

conclusionAMIUGraph provides a clinically grounded and utility-driven benchmarking framework that jointly evaluates KGE and GNN models across multiple healthcare graph types and learning settings. The findings offer practical guidance for selecting graph-based models in medical decision-support systems, including applications in gastrointestinal healthcare, while promoting transparency and reproducibility through the public release of all datasets, protocols, and code.

Indexed as

BenchmarkingKnowledge BasesMachine LearningGraph Neural NetworksHumansBenchmarkingBiomedical applicationsGraph neural networksInductive learningKnowledge graph embeddingLink prediction

Identifiers

PMID42471636
PMCPMC13663255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.