Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42471630›Full record

SynthesisBMC health services research2026

Healing after war/conflict: transformative health workforce strategies for a resilient future: a systematic scoping review.

Aregawi Gebreyesus, Tesfay Brhane Gebremariam, Mengistu Hagazi Tequare, Samuel Kidane, Mache Tsadik, Measho Gebreslassie Gebregziabher, Mengistu Welday Gebremichael, Leake Gebremeskel, Kalayu Brhane Mruts, Mulu Woldegiorgis and 2 more

Abstract readScoping ReviewSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Aregawi GebreyesusSchool of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Mekelle University, Mekelle, Tigray, Ethiopia. aregawi.belay@mu.edu.et.
Tesfay Brhane GebremariamSchool of Public Health, Debre Berhan University, Debre Berhan, Ethiopia.
Mengistu Hagazi TequareSchool of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Mekelle University, Mekelle, Tigray, Ethiopia.
Samuel KidaneMERQ Consultancy LLC, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Mache TsadikSchool of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Mekelle University, Mekelle, Tigray, Ethiopia.
Measho Gebreslassie GebregziabherSchool of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Mekelle University, Mekelle, Tigray, Ethiopia.
Mengistu Welday GebremichaelSchool of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Mekelle University, Mekelle, Tigray, Ethiopia.
Leake GebremeskelSchool of Pharmacy, College of Health Sciences, Mekelle University, Mekelle, Tigray, Ethiopia.
Kalayu Brhane MrutsStrategy and Performance, Murray Primary Health Network, Victoria, Australia.
Mulu WoldegiorgisMERQ Consultancy LLC, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Tilahun HareguMERQ Consultancy LLC, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Alula M TekluMERQ Consultancy LLC, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHuman resources for health (HRH) are critical for effective healthcare delivery, particularly in post-conflict settings where health systems face severe challenges. Post-conflict environments often exacerbate pre-existing HRH challenges, such as shortages, poor working conditions, and limited training opportunities. This scoping review aims to identify and synthesize evidence on interventions addressing HRH in post-conflict settings, highlighting strategies, outcomes, and barriers to their implementation.

methodsA systematic search was conducted across multiple databases (e.g., PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science) and grey literature sources, including WHO and ReBUILD Consortium reports. Inclusion criteria encompassed quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-method studies, reviews, and guidelines focused on HRH interventions in post-conflict settings published since 1990. Data were charted and analyzed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) framework to identify key themes, interventions, and outcomes.

resultsThe review included 14 studies, comprising primary research and systematic, scoping, and narrative reviews. Key interventions identified include recruitment and deployment strategies, capacity-building programs, incentive schemes, and retention mechanisms. Case studies from Sub-Saharan Africa, Southeast Asia, and the Middle East highlighted innovative policies, such as community-based recruitment and accelerated training programs. Barriers to implementation included political instability, lack of funding, and uncoordinated efforts among stakeholders. Successful initiatives involved long-term planning, local community engagement, and integration with broader health system recovery strategies.

conclusionEffective HRH interventions in post-conflict settings require comprehensive planning, coordination among stakeholders, and sustained investment. Policies should prioritize retention, capacity building, and equitable deployment to rebuild resilient health systems. These findings provide a roadmap for policymakers and practitioners to enhance HRH recovery efforts in similar contexts.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareHealth WorkforceWarfareCapacity BuildingHumansPublic Health InfrastructureHuman resources for healthHuman workforcePost-war/conflictPost-war/conflict intervention

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.