ArticleBMC urology2026
Sperm morphology indices as exploratory screening tools for elevated DNA fragmentation: a single-centre correlation and threshold derivation study.
Article in BMC urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSperm morphology assessment remains a routine component of semen analysis, yet its relationship with sperm DNA fragmentation at the level of individual morphological indices is incompletely characterised. This study evaluated correlations between the Teratozoospermia Index (TZI), Sperm Deformity Index (SDI), and Multiple Anomalies Index (MAI) with the DNA Fragmentation Index (DFI), deriving exploratory thresholds to identify men at risk of elevated DNA fragmentation (DFI > 20%).
methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on 135 semen samples from men aged 20-55 years attending a university andrology centre. Morphology was assessed on Papanicolaou-stained smears; TZI, SDI, and MAI were calculated manually. DNA fragmentation was measured using the GC-SCD-20 kit. Pearson correlation and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis with Youden-optimised thresholds were performed.
resultsAll three indices showed statistically significant, weak positive correlations with DFI: TZI (r = 0.263, p = 0.001), SDI (r = 0.290, p = 0.004), and MAI (r = 0.371, p < 0.001). ROC analysis demonstrated modest discriminatory performance: AUC values of 0.645, 0.620, and 0.680 respectively. At thresholds of TZI > 1.85, SDI > 2.42, and MAI > 2.53, sensitivity ranged from 82% to 90% with specificity of 44-53%.
conclusionTZI, SDI, and MAI correlate weakly but significantly with DFI and demonstrate a high-sensitivity, low-specificity screening profile. These thresholds are exploratory, derived from a single cohort, and require prospective validation in larger independent studies before clinical application. They should be regarded as adjunctive tools within routine semen analysis and cannot substitute for direct DNA fragmentation testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.