Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42471615›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2026

Feasibility and acceptability of a joint employee-manager workplace intervention to support mental health and job retention (MENTOR 2.0).

Arianna Prudenzi, Olivia Hastings, Libby Grey, Naomi Johnston, Jonathan Stuart, Steven Marwaha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Arianna PrudenziInstitute for Mental Health, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK. a.prudenzi@bham.ac.uk.
Olivia HastingsInstitute for Mental Health, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Libby GreyInstitute for Mental Health, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Naomi JohnstonMind Charity, 2 Redman Place E20 1JQ, London, E20 1JQ, UK.
Jonathan StuartMind Charity, 2 Redman Place E20 1JQ, London, E20 1JQ, UK.
Steven MarwahaInstitute for Mental Health, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Employees experiencing mental health difficulties frequently encounter barriers to both securing and sustaining employment. Despite increased recognition of mental health in the workplace, most interventions continue to target employees in isolation, with limited attention to the relational and organisational contexts in which mental health issues arise. To address this gap, we developed MENTOR 2.0 - the first joint employee-manager workplace intervention designed to enhance employee wellbeing and job retention through targeted improvements in work engagement, interpersonal relationships at work, and psychological flexibility. Building on our initial feasibility study (MENTOR 1.0) (Prudenzi et al., 2024, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2023.100720 ), MENTOR 2.0 involved four individual and one joint session with employees and their line managers, facilitated by a trained Mental Health Employment Liaison Worker (MHELW) - a novel role designed to facilitate conversations between employees and line managers. Twenty-three employees and nineteen managers participated in the study. All completed baseline, mid-intervention, and post-intervention surveys, along with 18 brief daily diaries per participant. Feasibility outcomes were positive: 94% of planned sessions were delivered as scheduled, the average programme duration was 65 days, and post-intervention retention was 87%. Qualitative feedback indicated high acceptability, with participants valuing the opportunity for open and confidential dialogue with managers, as well as the supportive role of the MHELW. Preliminary quantitative findings suggested reductions in psychological distress and improvements in productivity, psychological flexibility, work engagement, and workplace interpersonal functioning. While the single-arm design and limited sample size constrain generalisability, the study followed rigorous feasibility trial methods and demonstrates a novel, context-sensitive intervention model with clear translational potential. MENTOR 2.0 advances current practice by embedding mental health promotion within the social dynamics of the workplace, shifting away from individualised treatment models toward a more relational and systemic approach. Feasibility trial registration MENTOR: ISRCTN79256498 (20/09/2021).

Indexed as

Mental HealthWorkplaceAdultFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansInterpersonal RelationsJob SecurityMaleMiddle AgedBurnoutEmployeesManagersMental healthProductivityWellbeingWorkplace intervention

Identifiers

PMID42471615
PMCPMC13660277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.