Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42471614›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2026

Densitometric gains do not uniformly translate into clinical and psychosocial recovery: a 12-month multidimensional analysis of romosozumab therapy in postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Ömer Faruk Bucak, Cigdem Cinar, Eser Kalaoglu, Umit Yalcin, İbrahim Halil Erdem, Evrim Coskun, Yusuf Celik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ömer Faruk BucakDepartment of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, University of Health Sciences, Başakşehir Çam and Sakura City Hospital, İstanbul, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3995-8120
Cigdem CinarDepartment of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Biruni University Hospital, İstanbul, Türkiye. ccinar@biruni.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9159-6345
Eser KalaogluDepartment of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Istanbul Physical Therapy Rehabilitation Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8959-6522
Umit YalcinDepartment of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, University of Health Sciences, Başakşehir Çam and Sakura City Hospital, İstanbul, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4799-2759
İbrahim Halil ErdemDepartment of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, University of Health Sciences, Başakşehir Çam and Sakura City Hospital, İstanbul, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1979-3672
Evrim CoskunDepartment of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, University of Health Sciences, Başakşehir Çam and Sakura City Hospital, İstanbul, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3738-7627
Yusuf CelikDepartment of Biostatistics, Biruni University Medical Faculty, İstanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8051-9245

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough romosozumab produces substantial increases in bone mineral density (BMD), these densitometric gains may not necessarily translate into parallel clinical and psychosocial recovery. This study aimed to determine whether improvements in BMD reflect meaningful changes in pain, quality of life, kinesiophobia, and psychological status during romosozumab therapy, and to define the multidimensional structure of treatment response. Densitometric, clinical, and psychological responses were hypothesized to follow partially independent and region-specific trajectories.

methodsThis single-center cohort study included 46 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis treated with romosozumab and followed for 12 months. BMD was assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry at the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and total femur at baseline, 6, and 12 months. Pain (VAS), kinesiophobia (TAMPA), anxiety and depression (HADS), and quality of life (QUALEFFO-41) were evaluated at the same time points. Longitudinal changes were analyzed using repeated-measures ANOVA, correlation analyses, and exploratory hierarchical cluster analysis.

resultsBMD increased significantly at all skeletal sites over 12 months (all p < 0.001), with the greatest gains in the lumbar spine (~ 19%), followed by the femoral neck (~ 9%) and total femur (~ 6%). All clinical and psychosocial outcomes improved significantly (all p < 0.001; partial η² = 0.625-0.934). Changes in lumbar spine BMD showed statistically significant but modest associations with quality of life and depressive symptoms (r = - 0.304 to - 0.422, p < 0.05-0.01). Similarly, changes in femoral BMD parameters were modestly associated with pain (r = - 0.341 to - 0.481, p < 0.05-0.01) and kinesiophobia (r = - 0.308 to - 0.342, p < 0.05). Exploratory hierarchical cluster analysis identified distinct clusters separating patient-reported outcomes from densitometric parameters, with prior osteoporosis treatment history emerging as a bridging variable between these domains.

conclusionDensitometric gains during romosozumab therapy do not uniformly translate into patient-perceived recovery. Treatment response is multidimensional and region-specific, indicating that BMD alone is insufficient to capture therapeutic effectiveness. The region-specific pattern of these modest associations, femoral BMD changes with pain and kinesiophobia, and lumbar BMD changes with quality of life and depressive symptoms, supports the need for anatomically informed, patient-centered evaluation frameworks in osteoporosis management.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalBone DensityBone Density Conservation AgentsOsteoporosis, PostmenopausalAbsorptiometry, PhotonAgedCohort StudiesFemaleHumansKinesiophobiaLumbar VertebraeMiddle AgedQuality of LifeTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, MonoclonalBone Density Conservation AgentsAnxietyBone mineral densityDepressionKinesiophobiaOsteoporosisPainQuality of lifeRomosozumab

Identifiers

PMID42471614
PMCPMC13663268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.