Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42471602›Full record

SynthesisBMC public health2026

A systematic review of water, sanitation, and hygiene practices in developing countries: exploring the effects on public health.

Etagegn Shacho, Kassahun Eba, Samuel Fekadu

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Etagegn ShachoDepartment of Statistics, College of Natural Science, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia. setagegn@gmail.com.
Kassahun EbaDepartment of Environmental Health Science and Technology, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia.
Samuel FekaduDepartment of Environmental Health Science and Technology, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLack of proper access to safe Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene (WASH) is a pervasive cause of preventable disease and mortality in developing countries, disproportionately impacting the most vulnerable portions of the population. Despite activity globally, much still needs to be accomplished regarding expansion of WASH coverage, and the issue still remains a defining public health challenge. This systematic review synthesizes available evidence to assess the current status of WASH practices, associated health outcomes, and the barriers to effective safe WASH behaviors in developing countries. .

methodThe systematic review examined WASH practice and access conditions in the developing world. Of a total of 1273 records identified via Google Scholar, Scopus, MEDLINE, Embase, and PubMed, 44 studies were incorporated that meet the inclusion criteria through a rigorous screening process according to PRISMA guidelines. Quality of studies was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool (RoB 2), and reviewed by three authors. RoB 2 tool was applied using five primary domains randomization, deviation from interventions, missing data, outcome measurement, and selective reporting to critically assess the methodological quality of included studies.

resultsAccording to the reviewed papers, approximately 73% of the study focused on children and newborns under the age of five, indicating their high prevalence of WASH-related illnesses. Up to 69% of households do not treat their drinking water and only one-third of caregivers practice consistent handwashing at important periods. In children aged 6-23 months, soap-based handwashing significantly lowers diarrhea and respiratory illnesses. Access to clean and safe water remains limited, with just 16-50% of populations in some countries (e.g., Bangladesh, Tanzania, Ethiopia, and Chad) having sufficient access. Improved water sources are frequently available, although household-level treatment and storage remain low (4.7%-34% in rural areas). Water availability is heavily influenced by socioeconomic factors such as income, female education, and political stability. Several countries (e.g., Nigeria, Bangladesh, Ethiopia, Kenya, and India) have low sanitation coverage, whereas others (China and South Africa) do better. Improved sanitation facilities limit pathogen exposure, improve child nutrition by reducing intestinal infections, and increase economic and environmental sustainability.

conclusionThe evaluated research shows that WASH-related illnesses disproportionately impact children under the age of five, who make up roughly three-quarters of the study population. Despite progress in upgrading water sources, access to safe and clean water remains extremely limited, particularly in low-income and politically insecure areas. Household water purification and safe storage methods are woefully inadequate, leaving households vulnerable to preventable infections.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesHygienePublic HealthSanitationWater SupplyHumansDeveloping countriesHygienePublic healthSystematic reviewWater, Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH)

Identifiers

PMID42471602
PMCPMC13663242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.