ArticleBMC primary care2026
Changes in publicly insured general practitioner consultations before and after workplace injury: interrupted time series by consultation duration and care plans in Australia.
Article in BMC primary care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGeneral practitioners (GPs) are central to the treatment and management of injured workers. Australian workers' compensation funds GP consultations for work-related injuries. Almost all other GP consultations are subsidised by public healthcare insurance (Medicare Benefit Scheme). This study aimed to examine changes in publicly-insured GP consultations before and after injury for injured workers with long-duration claims, focusing on consultation duration types and GP-provided mental health and chronic diseases management plans.
methodsThis retrospective cohort study using interrupted time series analysis included 3,755 injured workers and 10,113 community individuals with injury/index date between 2006 and 2016. We compared monthly changes in rates (per 1000 workers) of six GP consultation types for 12-month before and 24-months after injury. Acute and long-term changes were examined both overall (combining all consultation types) and separately by consultation type. Consultation types include four duration-based levels: A (0-6 min), B (6-20 min), C (20-40 min), and D (40-60 min), and two types describing mental health and chronic disease management plans.
resultsAfter injury, injured workers received an additional 1,600 Medicare-subsidised GP consultations per 1,000 workers per year compared to the community group. Post-injury, the largest increase in monthly consultation rates was observed for Level D consultations (IRR: 2.37, 95% CI: 1.35, 4.20), while the smallest increment was observed for Level B consultations (IRR: 1.45, 95% CI: 1.32, 1.59). Monthly GP mental health care and chronic disease development plan rates increased by 84% (IRR: 1.84, 95% CI: 1.17, 2.93) and 20% (IRR: 1.20, 95% CI: 0.78, 1.86) post injury, respectively; however, the monthly rates of these consultations were small (maximum 25/1000 workers) Following these initial increases immediately post-injury, monthly consultation rates decreased by 3% to 9% and by 24-months post-injury had returned to levels observed in the comparison group.
conclusionAll six types of publicly insured GP consultations increased temporarily in the initial months following injury, regardless of worker's compensation status. These consultations remained elevated above pre-injury levels for over 12 months, likely reflecting delayed claim acceptance or increased care needs. These findings highlight the need of a comprehensive, whole-person approach to recovery that addresses both immediate and broader healthcare needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.