ArticleThe journal of headache and pain2026
Exploratory development of prediction models for pharmacotherapy outcomes in trigeminal neuralgia: a combined analysis based on multi-source data.
Article in The journal of headache and pain, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDrug-refractory trigeminal neuralgia (DRTN) represents a formidable challenge in clinical management, with approximately 30%-50% of patients eventually progressing to DRTN. Early identification of high-risk DRTN populations and prediction of the timing of pharmacotherapy failure are crucial for optimizing clinical treatment strategies.
methodsThis retrospective study enrolled 163 primary trigeminal neuralgia patients receiving carbamazepine/oxcarbazepine with comprehensive imaging. A partially-blinded approach was used for data extraction: 135 patients (December 2022-December 2024) formed the primary cohort and 28 patients (December 2021-December 2022) served as the temporally separated validation cohort. Data comprised clinical baseline characteristics, pain and emotional scale scores, and imaging parameters. A nested cross-validation framework (20 random seeds) was used for model development, with feature selection confined to the training cohort within each seed. Five machine learning models were compared via pooled ROC curves aggregated across seeds, and SHAP analysis interpreted the optimal model at the median-performing seed. Age-unadjusted and age-adjusted multivariate Cox regression models were constructed, with four parallel univariate screening thresholds evaluated in sensitivity analyses. Model performance was assessed by Kaplan-Meier analysis, time-dependent ROC curves, and the concordance index.
resultsThe support vector machine with radial basis function kernel (SVM-RBF) achieved the optimal performance, with average AUCs of 0.927 ± 0.041, 0.824 ± 0.049, and 0.806 ± 0.058 in the training, test, and validation cohort, respectively. In a sensitivity analysis using four univariate Cox screening thresholds, with age at first pain onset forced into all multivariate models, pain involved extent and medial temporal lobe atrophy (MTA) score were both identified as significant, independent candidate prognostic markers. Both Cox models showed moderate discriminative capacity for short-to-medium-term DRTN prognosis but attenuated long-term predictive efficacy.
conclusionThe SVM-RBF model, integrating multi-source heterogeneous data, demonstrated promising predictive performance for DRTN onset risk across the present cohort. The Cox models showed moderate discriminative capacity for short-to-medium-term prognosis, though long-term predictive accuracy was attenuated. These findings provide preliminary evidence for early risk stratification and individualized treatment of DRTN, while underscoring the need for improved survival prediction strategies to address the limited long-term performance of the current Cox models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.