ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2026
Quantifying Helmet Fit and Comfort in American Football Players: A Comprehensive Assessment.
Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo quantify a helmet-to-head pressure threshold for comfort and a preferred range of chin strap tightness in American football athletes.
methodsA football helmet model was instrumented with capacitive force sensors and load cells to measure contact pressure and chin strap tension. Anthropometric measurements and 3D head scans were obtained to analyze head shape and hair volume. Twenty-eight collegiate football athletes participated in the study. Participants adjusted the helmet at repeatable tightness increments until the helmet was too tight and/or uncomfortable and provided subjective ratings of fit in each cranial region (frontal, temporal, parietal, occipital), and an overall comfort rating at each tightness increment. Helmet-to-head contact pressure and chin strap tension were recorded at each tightness increment.
resultsHead shape dimensions were associated with contact pressure, while hair volume was not. Helmet-to-head pressure was associated with comfort. Participants' subjective feedback indicated that average pressure in the range of 4-7 kPa is comfortable, while most participants indicated average pressures above 7 kPa or pressure concentrations exceeding 20 kPa are uncomfortable. The subjective feedback also indicated average chin strap tension in the range of 5-13 N was preferred by the athletes. Given the area of the chin cup, the average pressure exerted on the chin is consistent with the helmet-to-head pressures that were reported to be comfortable.
conclusionsHead shape features beyond circumference affect helmet comfort, suggesting more information is required to fit helmets properly than only head circumference. These findings provide objective helmet comfort and chinstrap fit thresholds for American football athletes, which can be used to validate fitting conditions on surrogate headforms in laboratory testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42471541What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.