ArticleClinical and translational science2026
Exploring Risks of Adverse Drug Events From Single Drug to Three-Drug Combination.
Article in Clinical and translational science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Use of three-drug combinations is common and could increase the risk of adverse drug events (ADEs). Signals of ADEs from three-drug combinations could be identified from real-world data, and the risks of ADEs from single drug exposure to three-drug combination exposure could be illustrated by a graphic model. We used a US nationwide insurance claim database. We explored the relationship between drug exposure (from single drugs to three-drug combinations) and risks of ADEs (acute kidney injury, gastrointestinal bleeding, and opioid-related ADE). We used a conditional logistic regression model to estimate the odds ratios (ORs), the posterior probability of null hypothesis to control false discovery rate (FDR), and a graphic model to illustrate the ORs from single drug exposure to three-drug combination exposure. We derived approximately 1.7 million covariate-matched ADE-case-control pairs and investigated approximately 0.25 million three-drug combinations. We identified 3412 signals of adverse three-drug combinations (FDR < 0.01 and OR > 2). For the signals, we observed the medians and interquartile ranges (IQRs) of ORs increased from single drug exposure (median = 1.03, IQR: 0.95-1.15), through two-drug combination exposure (median = 1.45, IQR: 1.23-1.75), to three-drug combination exposure (median = 2.95, IQR: 2.43-3.91). We built a webpage-based tool to illustrate the ORs from single drug exposure to three-drug combination exposure. In conclusion, certain three-drug combinations are associated with an increased risk of ADE, and the risks of ADE could increase from single drug exposure to three-drug combination exposure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.